02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR 219<br />

8. The Führerbefehl and the Origins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“Extermination Camps” in the East<br />

8.1. The Führerbefehl and <strong>Holocaust</strong> Historiography<br />

During the Nuremberg trial, at the morning hearing <strong>of</strong> 15 April<br />

1946, the former commander <strong>of</strong> the Auschwitz camp, Rudolf Höß, declared<br />

that, in the summer <strong>of</strong> 1941, he was ordered, by Reichsführer SS<br />

Heinrich Himmler to come to Berlin and that Himmler told him on that<br />

occasion that Hitler had given the order to exterminate the Jews. 633 This<br />

Führerbefehl immediately became the cornerstone <strong>of</strong> mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong><br />

historiography then taking shape but still lacking any kind <strong>of</strong> documentation.<br />

Over the following decades these historians went on to<br />

build upon this meager foundation a fortress <strong>of</strong> assertions and hypotheses<br />

so full <strong>of</strong> internal inconsistencies that in the late seventies David<br />

Irving would go so far as to question whether Hitler was even aware <strong>of</strong><br />

the alleged genocide. 634 The ensuing debate <strong>of</strong> these theses, moved<br />

along by Martin Broszat, then director <strong>of</strong> the Munich Institut für Zeitgeschichte,<br />

592 generated new points <strong>of</strong> view which brought with them a<br />

new historiographic concept, known as the functionalist or structuralist<br />

concept. Right from the start and in a way inevitably, this concept was<br />

at odds with the ailing Nuremberg concept – which we may call intentionalist<br />

– because at heart it constituted a critical reaction to the teachings<br />

<strong>of</strong> this “courtroom-based” historiography, the historiographic failings<br />

<strong>of</strong> which it exposed all too clearly. Hitler’s role in the alleged genocide<br />

was reassessed along entirely different perspectives, becoming<br />

more and more obscure in the process and finally ending up in a “nod”<br />

by Hitler or in a “meeting <strong>of</strong> minds.”<br />

Mainstream <strong>Holocaust</strong> historians dedicated two major meetings to<br />

these burning problems.<br />

The first <strong>of</strong> them was an international congress on the topic “Nazi<br />

Germany and the extermination <strong>of</strong> the Jews,” organized by the Ecole<br />

633<br />

634<br />

IMT, vol. XI, p. 398.<br />

D. Irving, Hitler’s War. Wiking Press, New York, 1977.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!