02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR 189<br />

6.5. The Sobibór Trial that Never Took Place<br />

As opposed to the defendants in the Sobibór trials in Berlin, Frankfurt,<br />

or Hagen, who had merely occupied low-level posts during the<br />

war, the man brought to trial in Vienna in 1962 in connection with the<br />

events at Sobibór, Beec, and Treblinka was a real heavyweight. Hermann<br />

Julius Höfle, born in 1911, had been “Referent für Judenangelegenheiten<br />

– Aktion Reinhardt” (counselor for Jewish affairs – Aktion<br />

Reinhardt) in Lublin and deputy <strong>of</strong> Odilo Globocnik, the chief <strong>of</strong> SS<br />

and police in Lublin. It was he who reported in a radio message that up<br />

to the end <strong>of</strong> 1942 1,274,166 persons had been transported to “B.,” “S.”<br />

and “T.” Referring to a meeting with Höfle, Fritz Reuter would write in<br />

March <strong>of</strong> 1943 that the Jews deported to Beec would be moved on<br />

“across the border and would never return to the General Government.”<br />

542<br />

Hermann Höfle had been taken prisoner by the British in 1945 and<br />

handed over to the Austrian judicial authorities in 1947 but was liberated<br />

soon thereafter. In 1961 he was arrested once again and indicted.<br />

On 20 (other sources make it the 21 st ) August 1962, just prior to the<br />

opening <strong>of</strong> the trial, he hanged himself in his Vienna prison. 543 This, at<br />

least, is the <strong>of</strong>ficial version, which is not altogether convincing, though.<br />

After Höfle’s arrest, enough evidence was collected against him to<br />

fill nine volumes, but “the Vienna prosecutor’s <strong>of</strong>fice had not managed<br />

by that date [Höfle’s alleged suicide] to extract a formal indictment<br />

from those substantial files.” 544<br />

This clearly indicates that Höfle had never admitted the annihilation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Jews that the prosecution intended to lay at his feet. If he had indeed<br />

confessed, it would have been the easiest thing in world for the<br />

prosecution to prepare “a formal indictment from those substantial<br />

files.” This leads one to believe that Höfle, who knew very well what<br />

went on in the camps at Beec, Sobibór, and Treblinka, had stolidly<br />

maintained in the face <strong>of</strong> the Austrian judiciary that the three camps had<br />

been transit camps and that the alleged annihilations were nothing but<br />

propaganda.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the important part played by Höfle in connection with the<br />

deportations <strong>of</strong> the Jews, the impending trial would have encountered<br />

542<br />

543<br />

544<br />

Cf. chapter 9, p. 297.<br />

www.deathcamps.org/reinhard/hoefle html<br />

www nachkriegsjustiz.at/prozesse/geschworeneng/rezeption.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!