02.11.2013 Views

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

Sobibor - Holocaust Propaganda And Reality - Unity of Nobility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290 J. GRAF, T. KUES, C. MATTOGNO, SOBIBÓR<br />

In fact, Himmler did not propose “to designate this camp a concentration<br />

camp” but ordered the camp to be “converted into a concentration<br />

camp” – the difference is not irrelevant. Furthermore, it is wrong to<br />

say that “Pohl rejected this change <strong>of</strong> name,” because Pohl replied<br />

merely that setting up “at Sobibór an installation for the defusing <strong>of</strong><br />

enemy munitions, can be realized without such a conversion.”<br />

Hence, it was not a question <strong>of</strong> designation or <strong>of</strong> name, but one <strong>of</strong><br />

organization, as Hilberg himself explained in a different context: 880<br />

“A special enterprise was ordered by Himmler for Sobibór. This<br />

camp was set aside for the disassembly <strong>of</strong> captured ammunition in<br />

order to salvage the metals and explosives. The enterprise was not<br />

going to be incorporated into the WVHA industry network, inasmuch<br />

as it was designated to work for the SS-Führungshauptamt exclusively.”<br />

(Emph. added)<br />

These manipulations show Hilberg’s obvious embarrassment. How<br />

can anyone believe that Himmler and Pohl would have used an alleged<br />

“coded language” even in top secret documents? The most reasonable<br />

explanation, therefore, continues to be that the “myth <strong>of</strong> Ostwanderung”<br />

was, in fact, not a “myth” at all.<br />

The very document used by Hilberg when he speaks <strong>of</strong> “eastern migration”<br />

(Ostwanderung) bears this out irrefutably.<br />

9.2. The Ostwanderung<br />

On 15 September 1942 a meeting took place between Reichsminister<br />

Albert Speer and SS-Obergruppenführer Oswald Pohl, head <strong>of</strong> SS-<br />

WVHA. The following day Pohl wrote a detailed report for Himmler.<br />

The discussion had involved four main topics, the first <strong>of</strong> which was<br />

“Enlargement <strong>of</strong> barrack camp Auschwitz as a consequence <strong>of</strong> eastern<br />

migration.” On this point, Pohl wrote: 881<br />

“In this manner Reichsminister Pr<strong>of</strong>. Speer wants to guarantee<br />

the deployment at short notice <strong>of</strong> approximately 50,000 Jews fit for<br />

work in existing enclosed factories which have existing possibilities<br />

880<br />

881<br />

Ibid., p. 986; but, as we have explained in the preceding chapter, the camp was built as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the chain <strong>of</strong> command linking Amtsgruppe C-Bauwesen <strong>of</strong> WVHA and the Bauleitung<br />

at Zamo.<br />

Pohl Report to Himmler <strong>of</strong> 16 September 1942 on the subject: a) Armament work. b)<br />

Bomb damage. BAK, NS 19/14, pp. 131-133.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!