01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (2/10) 045 (a)<br />

11.2 Activity and Financial Risks<br />

Each option’s financial appraisal is highly sensitive to the assumptions contained within it. The following<br />

are the most sensitive which would have the greatest impact upon the financial viability of any given<br />

option.<br />

Catchment Loss: Options 1-3 assume 22% catchment loss of <strong>Sandwell</strong> births if services move to the<br />

City Hospital site. This is consistent with RCRH principles but any significant margin of error may lead to<br />

either operational capacity problems or further reductions in income which may affect viability.<br />

Target Activity Repatriation: Significant work will be required to target circa 600 births largely from<br />

HoBtPCT commissioner and change patterns of referral and preference to grow the forecast City birth<br />

volumes. The impact of limited success in this area will worsen financial viability.<br />

Stand Alone Birth Centre Activity: The stand alone Birth Centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong>, in Option 3 has a target<br />

of attracting back 400 births from the assumed catchment loss. Whilst Option 3 was the preferred option<br />

from public consultation there was also evidence that the public want more information to understand<br />

this option fully and it is a service not currently available locally. The impact of attracting less than 400<br />

births may raise issues about financial, clinical and operational viability of the stand alone Birth Centre.<br />

General Trading Position: Historic SLR analysis has formed the baseline quantum of cost for maternity<br />

services. There is an implicit assumption that the SLR exercise has generated a robust understanding of<br />

the full maternity cost quantum. It is assumed future iterations of SLR will apply refinements to the<br />

understanding of the cost base but will not worsen the trading position.<br />

Costs: Released capital charge savings may accrue from decommissioning the <strong>Sandwell</strong> Maternity<br />

centre. However, the <strong>Trust</strong> would face a one off impairment cost which it may not be able to consider<br />

affording in <strong>2010</strong>/11 or 2011/12. External financial assistance may be required to finance this step.<br />

Overall costs are assumed to reduce in relation to income as each future birth is forecast to generate a<br />

30% contribution towards option affordability. If these births are not delivered then again financial<br />

viability is threatened.<br />

Table 13: Activity & Financial Risks<br />

Risk Do Minimum Option 1 Option 2 Option 3<br />

Catchment Loss –<br />

X X X<br />

22% of <strong>Sandwell</strong><br />

births<br />

Repatriated City<br />

X X X<br />

Births – 600<br />

Stand Alone Birth<br />

X<br />

Centre Births - 400<br />

General Trading X X X X<br />

Position<br />

Impairment Cost X X X<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!