01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (2/10) 037 (a)<br />

authorised to obtain consent. Such authority is generally gained through training and assessment in<br />

line with this policy. This means the staff member will be able successfully to explain the risks and<br />

benefits of and alternatives to the procedure being undertaken. This staff member may be a junior<br />

doctor or other health care professional.<br />

Advance Decisions<br />

Patients may have a ‘living will’ or ‘advance directive’ specifying how they would like to be treated in<br />

the case of future incapacity. Professionals cannot be required by such directives to provide<br />

particular treatments (which might be inappropriate). An advance refusal of treatment will be legally<br />

binding for a patient who now lacks capacity if made voluntarily by an appropriately informed person<br />

with capacity when made. An advance decision to refuse potentially life-saving treatment must be in<br />

writing and be witnessed.<br />

5 Roles and Responsibilities<br />

5.1 Medical Director<br />

The Medical Director is responsible for ensuring a robust system for the taking of consent and for<br />

monitoring the effectiveness of the system is in place across the <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />

The Medical Director is required, under the conditions of vicarious liability for the <strong>Trust</strong>, to be<br />

satisfied that where health care professionals either take consent or take on new roles or tasks such<br />

as delegated consent that the process is robust and staff are competent to carry out their roles.<br />

The Medical Director will ensure the policy is enforced in respect of any failures in compliance which<br />

are escalated to him/her.<br />

5.2 Consultant<br />

The Consultant carrying out the procedure is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the patient is<br />

genuinely consenting to what is being done. It is they who will be held responsible in law if they are<br />

challenged later. (GOOD PRACTICE IN CONSENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE: CONSENT TO EXAMINATION OR<br />

TREATMENT DOH NOVEMBER 2001). Where delegated consent is undertaken the Consultant(s) remain<br />

responsible for the consent processes.<br />

The Consultant will take part in identifying the training, supervision and review of staff taking part in<br />

the delegated consent process. (see Appendix G1).<br />

The Consultant must ensure that anyone taking delegated consent for a patient under their care:<br />

• Follows the processes in this policy for taking and recording consent<br />

• Has sufficient knowledge of the investigation or procedure and has an understanding of the<br />

risks involved,<br />

• Has the ability verbally to provide information that the patient asks about or needs to know<br />

about their condition, its treatment and prognosis, including any future effects on the<br />

patient’s lifestyle,<br />

• Has knowledge about alternatives to the proposed treatment, frequency of adverse effects,<br />

their seriousness and effectiveness compared to the treatment being proposed,<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!