Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SWBTB (2/10) 045 (a)<br />
followed the principles of Listening into Action (LiA) and asked staff to consider a number of potential<br />
service models and to highlight benefits and issues with each for women and staff. 110 staff attended<br />
the workshops and included staff based at both <strong>Hospitals</strong> and from a range of professional backgrounds<br />
and specialities. The feedback from these events was used to inform the development of options and<br />
the evaluation criteria.<br />
The Project Steering Group attended two meetings of the Working Group of the Joint Health Scrutiny<br />
Committee as part of the pre-consultation engagement and shared proposals, short listed options, the<br />
draft consultation document and proposed consultation framework. Discussion at these meetings raised<br />
some important issues and resulted in helpful changes to the short listed options to be included in the<br />
consultation (in particular the exclusion of the ‘Do Minimum’ option), draft consultation document and<br />
framework.<br />
Following agreement at the September meetings of the <strong>Trust</strong> and <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT <strong>Board</strong>s, <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT<br />
commenced formal public consultation on the three short listed options was commenced on 12 th October<br />
2009. An external consultancy developed the consultation document, recorded public meetings,<br />
received and analysed the responses to the consultation to produce a document presenting the outcome<br />
of the public consultation. In addition six staff engagement events, following Listening into Action<br />
principles, were held for <strong>Trust</strong> staff involved in delivering maternity services, with over seventy staff from<br />
a range of roles, grades and speciality areas attending these events. The Project Steering Group<br />
attended two Joint Health Scrutiny Committee meetings – one in October to present the consultation<br />
and one in January to present the interim findings from the public consultation and answer further<br />
questions.<br />
The document reporting the outcomes of public consultation is being presented to the <strong>Board</strong> at its<br />
meeting in February <strong>2010</strong> but key issues are summarised here. The findings from the public<br />
consultation process are taken from a variety of sources including:<br />
• 21 focus groups (15 in <strong>Sandwell</strong> and 6 in Heart of <strong>Birmingham</strong> areas), facilitated by Merida<br />
Associates (who kept written records of each group).<br />
• 7 public meetings (4 in <strong>Sandwell</strong> and 3 in HOB).<br />
• <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT and HOBtPCT Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) teams visited a number of<br />
maternity service sessions, such as antenatal clinics, to complete the questionnaire with people<br />
accessing services.<br />
• <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT PPI staff provided questions and comments sheets from presentations given to<br />
125 people from the community though <strong>Sandwell</strong> Link, the Patient Experience Forum and<br />
voluntary and community organisations.<br />
• Comments from Joint Health Scrutiny Committee (12th January <strong>2010</strong>)<br />
• Comment from RCRH (30th October 2009) and<br />
• Staff consultation activity carried out by SWBH <strong>Trust</strong> with over 70 staff, plus another 11 people<br />
through informal consultation.<br />
Everyone who attended a focus group or public meeting was encouraged (and supported) to complete a<br />
maternity services medium term review questionnaire.<br />
The above resulted in 780 completed questionnaires from within the consultation document or via<br />
websites and sent directly to Merida Associates for analysis, using a freepost address.<br />
Of the 780 people who completed the questionnaires:<br />
• 682 (88%) were women<br />
• 63 (8%) were men (35 people gave no answer to the question about gender).<br />
• 30 (4%) identified themselves as having a disability with a further 9 people indicating they were<br />
not sure whether or not they were disabled.<br />
16