01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (2/10) 035 (a)<br />

White and Black Caribbean<br />

This grouping was split between option 2 (44%) and option 3 (38%)<br />

One respondent was concerned about the impact of the impending changes on staff morale<br />

and, consequently, levels of patient care.<br />

Polish/Latvian/Eastern European<br />

66% of Polish/Latvian/Eastern European respondents chose option 3<br />

Yemeni<br />

66% of Yemeni respondents chose option 3<br />

The need to secure views from the Yemeni community were highlighted in the Equalities<br />

Impact Assessment. The majority of respondents were located in <strong>West</strong> Bromwich. The most<br />

important issue raised in questionnaire comments was about the cost of transport to City,<br />

particularly for non-car owners dependent on taxis, a shuttle bus was suggested by two<br />

respondents. The need for interpreting services was also mentioned.<br />

Women from Yemen in a focus group were aware of the choice between home births and<br />

hospital births, but their experience of home births in Yemen was not good, so they preferred<br />

to be in hospital.<br />

Women from this community would like to visit a Midwife-Led Birth Centre and to be able to<br />

find out more about it.<br />

6. Stakeholder Views<br />

The following groups provided written responses to the consultation:<br />

6.1 The Right Care Right Here Partnership <strong>Board</strong> response to the consultation noted that:<br />

“There was general support for the proposals in the consultation document, requiring the<br />

rationalisation of maternity services, with the consolidation of the majority of services onto one<br />

hospital site.”<br />

In the comments (which can be found in full at appendix 5) the <strong>Board</strong> noted that the whilst the<br />

presentation they were given and the information about the options clearly indicated that<br />

services would be consolidated at City Hospital there was insufficient detail as to why such as<br />

consolidation could not occur at <strong>Sandwell</strong>. They also noted that there was no detail relating<br />

the 2007 Users Survey which “indicated that the service was judged to be ‘least well<br />

performing’ and that service users were unhappy about the quality of care provided.”<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!