01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (2/10) 045 (a)<br />

All consultant led care and, all in-patient services and, temporarily all births would<br />

transfer to City Hospital. A Stand Alone Midwifery Led Birth Centre would be developed<br />

within <strong>Sandwell</strong> and, once operational, some midwifery led low risk births would relocate<br />

to the new centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong>. Low risk midwifery led antenatal care and routine<br />

screening will be available in <strong>Sandwell</strong> and at City Hospital. Consultant led antenatal care<br />

would be relocated to City Hospital. All Neonatal care would be provided at City Hospital,<br />

The Joint Health Scrutiny Committee also supported Option 3 but with the caveat that the stand alone<br />

Birth Centre is built and operational in <strong>Sandwell</strong> before maternity services are withdrawn from <strong>Sandwell</strong><br />

Hospital.<br />

The Project Steering Group has considered this carefully and whilst not able to recommend the caveat<br />

on clinical safety and quality grounds, it does recognise the significance of the concerns raised and<br />

agrees it is important to minimise the time between reconfiguring consultant led/high risk births to City<br />

Hospital and opening the stand alone Birth Centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong>, without delaying the reconfiguration of<br />

consultant led/high risk births. The Project Steering Group is therefore recommending further detailed<br />

work to analyse and find an approach to achieve this.<br />

The tables below summarise the financial analysis for Option 3 as the recommended option. They do<br />

not include any additional costs the <strong>Trust</strong> might incur as part of an approach to minimise the time<br />

between reconfiguring consultant led/high risk births to City Hospital and opening the stand alone Birth<br />

Centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong> without delaying the reconfiguration of consultant led/high risk births. If such an<br />

approach requires refurbishment work on one of the <strong>Trust</strong>’s sites it is estimated there will be an<br />

additional capital cost of £1.5 million and associated additional revenue costs relating to capital charges<br />

and facilities costs.<br />

Changes to Income and Expenditure associated with Option 3 (recommended option)<br />

Category £000’s Comments<br />

Income 1851<br />

Pay (353)<br />

Non Pay (1) Includes net saving in capital charges for<br />

decanting of <strong>Sandwell</strong> Maternity block<br />

Net Change 1274<br />

Summary of Capital Consequences of Option 3 (recommended option)<br />

Category £000’s Comments<br />

Capital 1851<br />

Depreciation (130)<br />

Rate of Return 15%<br />

Maintenance<br />

(150) Facilities charge from <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT for<br />

Costs/Facilities<br />

use of premises<br />

Charge<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!