Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SWBTB (2/10) 045 (a)<br />
15. JOINT HEALTH SCRUTINY COMMITTEE<br />
At its meeting on 7 th January <strong>2010</strong> the Joint Health Scrutiny Committee considered its response to the<br />
short listed options in Improving Services for Giving Birth as part of the public consultation. The<br />
Committee resolved that whilst ideally it would have preferred the full maternity provision to remain in<br />
<strong>Sandwell</strong>, it would support Option 3 but with the caveat that the stand alone Birth Centre is built and<br />
operational in <strong>Sandwell</strong> before maternity services are withdrawn from <strong>Sandwell</strong> Hospital. In addition the<br />
Committee resolved that if this option with the caveat is not supported by <strong>Sandwell</strong> PCT <strong>Board</strong>, the<br />
Committee is ‘minded’ to refer the matter to the Secretary of State for Health since it believes the<br />
proposals in the consultation document as they stand are not in the interests of the local health service<br />
because:<br />
• They do not fit with the national choice guarantee or care closer to home agenda<br />
• Concerns about capacity at City Hospital to deal with an increase in the number of births<br />
• More research is required to give a full regional perspective.<br />
The Project Steering Group has carefully considered the caveat proposed by the Committee and has<br />
concluded that this is not achievable because:<br />
• The caveat would require delaying the consolidation of high risk births at City Hospital. Such a<br />
delay would be clinically unacceptable for all the reasons outlined in the clinical case for change<br />
and subsequently endorsed by NCAT. A recent review of the service at <strong>Sandwell</strong> and the<br />
ongoing risks of maintaining this service has shown that whilst there have been improvements<br />
there are also significant continuing concerns. Any delay substantially increases the potential for<br />
emergency closure of the <strong>Sandwell</strong> site on clinical grounds. The risks associated with unplanned<br />
closure cannot be underestimated for example, City Hospital would not have the capacity to<br />
accommodate the <strong>Sandwell</strong> births until the refurbishment work outlined in this Business Case is<br />
complete. There is evidence of limited capacity in other local hospitals and so there is a high<br />
possibility that some <strong>Sandwell</strong> women would need to be transferred out of the local (<strong>Birmingham</strong><br />
and Black Country) area to give birth in this situation.<br />
• Establishing a stand alone Birth Centre prior to reconfiguring Consultant led / high risk services<br />
to City Hospital will detract focus from the mitigation of risks already associated with sustaining<br />
services over 2 sites (City and <strong>Sandwell</strong>) and will, initially at least, introduce a significant further<br />
level of risk over and above that already identified at and persisting at <strong>Sandwell</strong>.<br />
• Perinatal mortality rates in <strong>Sandwell</strong> are high. Spreading already limited staffing resources over<br />
an additional area will further impact upon the quality of care provision across the whole service<br />
and potentially exacerbate issues affecting perinatal mortality<br />
• Establishing a stand alone birth centre requires the expertise of highly skilled and experienced<br />
midwives familiar and comfortable with this unique model of care i.e. undertaking risk<br />
assessments, working independently of doctors, independent decision making etc. Midwives<br />
working within the <strong>Trust</strong>’s maternity service are not currently exposed to a midwifery led model of<br />
care. This is reflected in the very low percentage of home births and high intervention rates<br />
amongst low risk women. Historically, recruitment to the <strong>Trust</strong> has been poor and is one of the<br />
key drivers for making the proposed changes. Recruitment to the co-located Birth Centre at City<br />
Hospital in the first instance will allow midwives to develop their skills and expertise and become<br />
familiar with this model of care – this will occur in an environment where there is immediate<br />
access to emergency medical support and where there is an established infrastructure of<br />
training, supervision and support. This cohort of midwives would then be suitably equipped to<br />
provide expertise in the stand alone Birth Centre. Developing this expertise will take a minimum<br />
33