01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBTB (2/10) 045 (a)<br />

£508 589. Delivery of this financial position requires that 100% of future maternity income streams<br />

translate into resources available to the Women and Children Division.<br />

The Joint Health Scrutiny Committee supported Option 3 but with the caveat that the stand alone Birth<br />

Centre is built and operational in <strong>Sandwell</strong> before maternity services are withdrawn from <strong>Sandwell</strong><br />

Hospital. The Project Steering Group has considered this carefully and whilst not able to recommend the<br />

caveat on clinical safety and quality grounds it does recognise the importance of the concerns raised<br />

and is recommending that further work is undertaken to explore options to safely minimise the time<br />

between reconfiguring consultant led/high risk births to City Hospital and opening a stand alone Birth<br />

Centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong> without delaying the reconfiguration of consultant led/high risk births. Within this<br />

context it will be important to be clear that the priority must be the maintenance of the maximum possible<br />

level of safety and quality.<br />

18. RECOMMENDATION<br />

On the basis of the above analysis the <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Board</strong> is recommended to:<br />

• AGREE the business case for change.<br />

• APPROVE the Project Steering Group’s recommended option i.e. Option 3: All consultant<br />

led care and, all in-patient services and, temporarily all births would transfer to City<br />

Hospital. A Stand Alone Midwifery Led Birth Centre would be developed within <strong>Sandwell</strong><br />

and, once operational, some midwifery led low risk births would relocate to the new<br />

centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong>. Low risk midwifery led antenatal care and routine screening will be<br />

available in <strong>Sandwell</strong> and at City Hospital. Consultant led antenatal care would be<br />

relocated to City Hospital. All Neonatal care would be provided at City Hospital.<br />

• APPROVE the capital investment of £1.85 million required to support Option 3 and<br />

endorse the financial consequences of Option 3 i.e. targeting an overall improvement in<br />

the trading position of maternity services by 2013/14 of £508 589, recognising that to<br />

achieve this 100% of future maternity income streams need to translate into resources<br />

available to the Women and Children Division.<br />

• AGREE to the Project Steering Group undertaking further work to explore options to safely<br />

minimise the time between reconfiguring consultant led/high risk births to City Hospital and<br />

opening a stand alone Birth Centre in <strong>Sandwell</strong> without delaying the reconfiguration of consultant<br />

led/high risk births. To be clear however, that the priority must be the maintenance of the<br />

maximum possible level of safety and quality.<br />

• AGREE to a more detailed implementation plan being presented to the <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>Board</strong> at its May<br />

meeting.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!