01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SWBFC (1/10) 010<br />

considerations. Mr White explained that the 2009/10 pay summary line included all<br />

forecast related pay, whereas the plan for <strong>2010</strong>/11 was broken down into start point<br />

budgets together with a series of reserves for pay awards and activity related costs<br />

as offset by CIP targets. He was asked to ensure that future financial planning<br />

updates include greater detail on the plans to address pay costs.<br />

ACTION:<br />

Mr White to include greater detail on the plans to address pay costs<br />

in future financial planning updates<br />

7 Cost improvement programme (2009/10)<br />

7.1 CIP delivery report<br />

Mr Wharram presented the monthly 2009/10 CIP delivery report, which it was noted<br />

had been reviewed in detail at the Financial Management <strong>Board</strong> meeting.<br />

It was noted that there had been little change from the previous month, with<br />

performance being adrift of plan by 0.9%.<br />

7.2 Quality and Efficiency programme (QuEP) update<br />

SWBFC (1/10) 002<br />

SWBFC (1/10) 002 (a)<br />

-<br />

SWBFC (1/10) 002 (d)<br />

SWBFC (1/10) 008<br />

SWBFC (1/10) 008 (a)<br />

Mr Adler presented a summary of the progress with the workstreams forming the<br />

Quality and Efficiency Programme (QuEP).<br />

The Committee was advised that a red, amber and green rating was now used to<br />

provide an indication of progress with each of the workstreams.<br />

The Committee was pleased to hear that the pace of progress with the programme<br />

was good. The capacity review workstream was noted to be at red status, although<br />

it is anticipated that this work will be delivered by the year end as planned. The<br />

clinical directorate workstream was reported to require the identification of projects<br />

during the first quarter of <strong>2010</strong>/11. These will be kept under review.<br />

Detailed CIP and establishment review sign off meetings are planned shortly.<br />

Mr Trotman asked that the detailed outcome of some of the workstreams be shared<br />

with the Committee when available. Mr Adler suggested that the outcome of the<br />

benchmarking work may be shared shortly. Mr Grainger-Payne was asked to add<br />

an item concerning the most appropriate means of reporting the outcome of the<br />

QuEP work to the Committee to the agenda of the next Financial Management<br />

<strong>Board</strong> for discussion.<br />

ACTION:<br />

Mr Grainger-Payne to add an item concerning the most appropriate<br />

means of reporting the outcome of the QuEP work to the Finance and<br />

Performance Management Committee to the agenda of the next<br />

Financial Management <strong>Board</strong><br />

8 Minutes for noting<br />

8.1 Minutes of the Strategic Investment Review Group SWBSI (1/10) 001<br />

The Committee noted the minutes of the SIRG meeting held on 8 December 09.<br />

Page 6 of 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!