01.02.2014 Views

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

Trust Board Febuary 2010 - Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SWBTB (2/10) 037 (a)<br />

including the likelihood of its success and any alternatives to it. Permission given under any unfair or<br />

undue pressure is not consent.<br />

For consent to be valid the patient must:<br />

• Have capacity to make a particular decision<br />

• Have received sufficient information to consider and make the decision<br />

• Not be acting or making a decision under duress<br />

Where possible consent should be taken in advance of the procedure (ie in a pre-operative<br />

assessment clinic) so the patient has time to consider the options given and make an informed<br />

decision.<br />

Vicarious Liability<br />

Vicarious liability is a legal concept that means a party may be held responsible for injury or damage<br />

when in reality they were not actively involved in the incident. Parties that may be charged with<br />

vicarious liability are generally in a supervisory role over the person or parties personally responsible<br />

for the injury/damage. Vicarious liability implies that the employer is responsible for the acts of its<br />

employees, where employees are acting within the <strong>Trust</strong>’s terms and conditions/policies).<br />

Best Interests<br />

An act done or decision made, under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, for, or on behalf of, a person<br />

who lacks capacity or made in his/her best interests. Best interests are wider than medical interests<br />

and include the patient’s wishes, beliefs of the patient when competent, including general, spiritual<br />

and religious wellbeing. Healthcare professionals must consider all the relevant circumstances<br />

relating to the decision in question; these are listed in the Reference Guide to consent for<br />

examination or treatment, second edition.<br />

Mental Capacity<br />

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 defines a person who lacks capacity as a person who is unable to make<br />

a decision for themselves because of an impairment or disturbance of the functioning of the mind or<br />

brain. A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that they lack capacity: if<br />

there is doubt, the health professional must assess the capacity of the patient to take the decision in<br />

question, recording the assessment and conclusions drawn from it in the patient’s notes.<br />

Delegated Consent<br />

Valid consent to treatment involves a patient agreement to the intervention following a discussion<br />

and understanding of the risks and benefits of the procedure that is being undertaken. The<br />

Consultant carrying out the procedure is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the patient is<br />

genuinely consenting to what is proposed.<br />

Guidance from the Department of Health stipulates that consent is sought by a professional<br />

competent to do so because they either carry out the procedure themselves or have received<br />

specialist training in advising about the procedure, have been assessed by the organisation and are<br />

aware of their own knowledge limitations and are subject to audit. The taking of consent may<br />

therefore be delegated to a member of staff who is not capable of performing the procedure but is<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!