20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

• ASH Consulting Group, (1999), Central Region landscape character assessment,<br />

Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 123;<br />

• David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Stirling to Grangemouth landscape<br />

character assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 124;<br />

• David Tyldesley and Associates, (1999), Fife landscape character assessment,<br />

Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 113;<br />

• ASH Consulting Group, (1998), The Lothians landscape character assessment,<br />

Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 91; and<br />

• Land Use Consultants, (1999), Glasgow and the Clyde Valley landscape<br />

assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Review No 116.<br />

Graphics and Visualisations<br />

Visibility Maps<br />

9.2.10 Computer generated Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) maps have been generated using<br />

<strong>Wind</strong>Farm computer software to demonstrate the number of turbines that may theoretically<br />

be seen from any point in the study area.<br />

9.2.11 There are two ZTVs; the first, shown in Figure 9.7, indicates the number of turbines with hubs<br />

that are theoretically visible across the 35km radius while the second, shown in Figure 9.8<br />

indicates the number of turbines with blade tips that are theoretically visible across a 35km<br />

radius.<br />

9.2.12 These maps are based on a ‘bare ground’ model (Ordnance Survey (OS) Land<strong>for</strong>m Panorama<br />

data based on a 50m grid terrain model derived from 1:50,000 scale mapping). This<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is limited by the detail of the digital terrain model data used and this should be<br />

borne in mind in the consideration and use of the ZTVs.<br />

9.2.13 The ZTV maps do not take into account that areas within the ZTV zone can compromise<br />

woodland, hedgerows and built urban <strong>for</strong>m or other local features that may prevent or reduce<br />

visibility. The ZTV maps do not take account of the orientation of a viewer, such as the<br />

direction of travel and while they do allow <strong>for</strong> factors such as earth curvature and atmospheric<br />

refraction there is no allowance <strong>for</strong> attenuation of visibility with distance, weather or light.<br />

Localised subtleties of the land<strong>for</strong>m may not be picked up by this dataset and as such the<br />

resulting ZTV calculation does not include the subtle effects of localised land<strong>for</strong>m variations.<br />

9.2.14 The ZTV maps do not indicate the amount of each wind turbine that can be seen, simply that<br />

part of it which is potentially visible.<br />

9.2.15 These limitations mean that the ZTV maps tend to overestimate the extent of the influence on<br />

the landscape and visibility of the proposal. It should be considered as a tool to assist in<br />

assessing the theoretical visibility of the proposal and not a measure of the visual impact.<br />

November 2010 Chapter 9 Page 6<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!