20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

losses and gains during the construction and operation of the proposed wind energy<br />

development need to be evaluated on a site specific basis.<br />

6.4.12 Protecting and retaining the substantial reserves of carbon held in Scottish soils is an issue<br />

recognised by the Scottish Government. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) produced a<br />

Technical Guidance Note in 2003 <strong>for</strong> calculating carbon ‘payback’ times <strong>for</strong> wind farms. Nayak<br />

et al. updated this guidance in 2008 6 and 2009 and devised a carbon balance tool <strong>for</strong> wind<br />

farms being constructed on peat and which considers the impacts of wind farms during<br />

construction and operation on soil stability and long-term greenhouse gas emissions. Although<br />

the proposed wind energy development is not located on peat, the calculator can be used to<br />

give an indication of the amount of carbon emitted through the lifetime of the site, including<br />

from the construction and operation (maintenance, etc) of the wind turbines.<br />

6.4.13 The tool by Nayak was used to calculate the carbon balance (sum of the carbon losses and<br />

gains) <strong>for</strong> the proposed wind energy development. However, some amendments were made<br />

to the calculator to reflect the fact that disturbance would be to primarily mineral soil rather than<br />

peatland – there<strong>for</strong>e the risk of carbon loss from draining the soils is avoided, which is a major<br />

factor increasing payback time on peatlands 10 . The benefit of the calculator is that it allows <strong>for</strong><br />

the payback time to be calculated including the carbon involved in the construction and<br />

erection of the turbines (steel construction, transport, concrete in foundations and hardstanding<br />

etc) reflecting that the carbon “benefit” of the project is not immediate – though the payback<br />

time is shorter than on a peaty site.<br />

6.4.14 Table 6.1 shows the calculated carbon payback time associated with the proposed wind<br />

energy development. A breakdown of the input values and total carbon losses and gains<br />

associated with the proposed wind energy development are shown in Appendix 6.1.<br />

Table 6.1 Proposed <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Carbon Balance and Payback<br />

Carbon Gains (t CO 2 eq) Carbon Losses (t CO 2 eq) Overall Carbon Balance<br />

(t CO 2 eq)<br />

Total Payback Time<br />

(months)**<br />

0 * 8638 8638 6<br />

*There will be no improvement of degraded bogs, felled <strong>for</strong>estry or restoration of peat from borrow pits.<br />

**The carbon payback time of the proposed wind energy development is calculated by comparing the loss of carbon<br />

from the site due to wind farm construction with the carbon savings achieved by the wind farm (against fossil fuel<br />

counterfactual) during a 25 year operating period.<br />

6.4.15 The estimated total carbon payback time of the proposed wind energy development, based on<br />

carbon losses and gains compared with fossil fuel generation, is 6 months. This is increased to<br />

9 months against the current mix of electricity generation, which includes other renewable<br />

electricity sources and the payback is decreased to 5 months compared with coal-fired<br />

electricity generation. It should be noted that although the CO 2 emitted during wind farm<br />

construction is taken into account in this calculation, that produced from construction of the<br />

other <strong>for</strong>ms of power stations is not – there<strong>for</strong>e, in some ways this calculation is biased against<br />

the wind generation.<br />

6.4.16 There<strong>for</strong>e, when considering the 25 year operational period of the proposed wind energy<br />

development, the CO 2 payback time is very short in comparison.<br />

6.4.17 It should be noted that these figures have been calculated based on "reasonable worst-case"<br />

assumptions in the absence of site specific in<strong>for</strong>mation, and the results are there<strong>for</strong>e likely to<br />

be conservative.<br />

November 2010 Chapter 6 Page 5<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!