20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Species<br />

Curlew<br />

Conservation<br />

Value at<br />

<strong>Forthbank</strong><br />

International<br />

Effect Construction Significance Operation Significance<br />

Barrier Effect N/A at construction N/A Of the 31 recorded cormorant flights at least 8 (26%) passed<br />

directly through the proposed wind energy development area<br />

(the area enclosed by a line on a map joining the outermost<br />

turbine rotors of the wind farm), between the Forth Estuary and<br />

the Black Devon Wetlands or beyond. However, given the<br />

small scale of the proposed wind energy development it is likely<br />

that birds will continue to commute between these habitats<br />

simply passing around or over the wind energy development to<br />

avoid the turbines. Furthermore, there is the possibility that<br />

birds may still pass through the corridor between turbines 1 and<br />

2. Consequently, it is concluded that the proposed wind energy<br />

development will not act as a significant barrier to the<br />

movement of cormorant (neutral).<br />

Collision N/A at construction N/A Of the 31 flights recorded within and adjacent to the application<br />

site, 14 (18 birds) were “at risk”. The collision risk modelling<br />

produced a collision estimate of between 1 bird every 1-2 years<br />

(95% avoidance) and 1 bird every 8-9 years (99% avoidance).<br />

Taking the precautionary 95% avoidance rate prediction, this<br />

would result in approximately 15 collisions over the 25 year<br />

lifespan of the proposed wind energy development. However,<br />

the annual collision rate of 1 bird every 1-2 years would<br />

represent 0.3% of the SPA qualifying population.<br />

Consequently, the collision risk <strong>for</strong> cormorant is considered to<br />

be well within acceptable limits and thus will not significantly<br />

affect the SPA qualifying population (neutral).<br />

Not<br />

significant<br />

Not<br />

significant<br />

Habitat Loss No loss of habitat which is of value to the species (neutral). Not significant N/A at operation N/A<br />

Disturbance &<br />

Minor<br />

Moderate<br />

Displacement<br />

Curlew were recorded throughout the winter and passage<br />

periods. The peak count of 73 (January estuary zone count)<br />

represented 3.8% of the SPA qualifying population. However,<br />

numbers of around 20-40 birds were more usual although<br />

these still represented over 1% of the SPA population. Birds<br />

were often distributed near the mouth of the Black Devon,<br />

both at the estuary and on the adjacent arable fields, and<br />

within 500m of the application site. Groups of curlew were<br />

also found along the south side of the Forth Estuary, between<br />

500m and 1km from the application site. Studies of birds at<br />

roosting and feeding grounds in Holland found that curlew<br />

were displaced by operational turbines by up to 500m 38 . On<br />

the basis of this in<strong>for</strong>mation, a precautionary displacement<br />

range of 500m is considered <strong>for</strong> construction also. Given that<br />

flocks of curlew were often found within 500m of the<br />

application site it is likely that wintering birds will be displaced<br />

from the <strong>for</strong>aging and roosting grounds if construction<br />

As previously mentioned, many of the curlew recorded during<br />

the ornithological surveys were present within 500m of the<br />

application site (the precautionary displacement range <strong>for</strong> this<br />

species). Consequently there is a reasonably high likelihood<br />

that a significant proportion (i.e. ≥1%) of the curlew Firth of<br />

Forth SPA qualifying population will be displaced from<br />

traditional <strong>for</strong>aging and roosting grounds located within this<br />

distance throughout the lifespan of the proposed wind energy<br />

development due to the presence of the turbines. However,<br />

given that the majority of the survey area does not include the<br />

Firth of Forth SPA, and considering the availability of suitable<br />

alternative <strong>for</strong>aging and roosting grounds in the surrounding<br />

area (e.g. intertidal mudflats and arable fields) it is considered<br />

highly unlikely that birds will be displaced entirely from the<br />

Forth Estuary. Indeed, any displaced birds are likely to remain<br />

within Upper Forth Estuary. Given the above, such an effect is<br />

predicted to be of low magnitude although the impact<br />

November 2010 Chapter 12 Page 46<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!