20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Viewpoint 22: Tomtain Hill<br />

Figure Number: VP-22 a Existing View; VP-22b Wireframe<br />

Grid Reference NS 722 814 Elevation 438m AOD<br />

Bearing 299º Direction of View: North east<br />

LCT: Lowland Hills LCU: Kilsyth Hills<br />

Distance to nearest<br />

proposed turbine:<br />

19.45km<br />

Existing Cumulative<br />

visibility:<br />

Braes of Doune<br />

Craigengelt WF<br />

Earlsburn WF<br />

Greendykeside<br />

4<br />

Number of Hubs<br />

4 Number of turbines with<br />

theoretically visible:<br />

blades theoretically visible:<br />

Visual Effects:<br />

The visual effect caused by the proposed wind energy development is barely perceptible due to distance.<br />

Cumulative Effects:<br />

Craigengelt’s turbines are direct in the view to the north at a distance of 5km. Braes of Doune wind energy<br />

development’s layout is clearly visible behind Craigengelt at a 29.3km distance.<br />

Some blades of Earlsburn wind energy development break the skyline, otherwise all turbines and blades are seen<br />

against the backdrop of the Lowland Hills’ landmass.<br />

Greendykeside’s two turbines rise above the Lowland Plateaux landscape in the south. At a 14.3km distance they are<br />

clearly visible elements in the landscape.<br />

The Beauly- Denny transmission line would potentially be seen from this viewpoint because the view is orientated to<br />

the east where the Beuly-Denny transmission line would run between Cowie and Denny. These 400kV pylons would<br />

be not perceivable at the distance of 12km beyond Denny’s built up area.<br />

Magnitude of Change: Negligible<br />

Nature of impact<br />

Significance of Effect<br />

Indirect/Neutral<br />

Negligible<br />

9.4.94 Table 9.7-1 in Appendix 9.7 lists the viewpoints and summarises the assessment in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

of all 22 viewpoints.<br />

9.5 Cumulative Effects<br />

Introduction<br />

9.5.1 The purpose of the cumulative assessment is to ascertain how the addition of proposed<br />

<strong>Forthbank</strong> wind energy development will contribute to the cumulative effects of wind energy<br />

developments on the landscape and visual resource within the study area.<br />

9.5.2 Cumulative effects may arise where a landscape character receptor or view is affected by<br />

more than one wind energy development, which occurs where the study areas <strong>for</strong> two or more<br />

wind energy developments overlap so that they are experienced at proximity where they may<br />

have an incremental effect.<br />

9.5.3 Three types of cumulative visual impact are considered in the assessment: combined,<br />

successive and sequential (Guidance taken from Cumulative Effect of <strong>Wind</strong> energy<br />

developments, Scottish Natural Heritage, issued 13/04/051). Combined and successive<br />

impacts are from static viewpoints, whereas sequential impacts relate to viewers who are<br />

moving.<br />

• Combined effects occur where a static observer is able to see two or more<br />

developments from one viewpoint within the observer’s arc of vision at the same<br />

time.<br />

• Successive effects occur where two or more wind energy developments may be<br />

seen from a static viewpoint but the observer has to turn to see them.<br />

November 2010 Chapter 9 Page 96<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!