20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Viewpoint 3: Clackmannan Public Park<br />

Figure Number: CW-3a; CW – 3b<br />

Grid Reference NS 911 916 Elevation 30m AOD<br />

Bearing 255º Direction of View: west<br />

LCT: Lowland River Valley LCA: Carse of Forth<br />

Distance to nearest 1.60km<br />

Assessed Magnitude of High<br />

Turbine:<br />

Change:<br />

Cumulative effect with Craigengelt WF<br />

Cumulative effect with Earlsburn North<br />

operating WF:<br />

Earlsburn WF<br />

approved WF:<br />

Cumulative effect with Muirpark Cumulative effects: Combined visibility<br />

application WF:<br />

Cumulative Effects:<br />

Craigengelt wind energy development is clearly visible on the Craigengelt Hill between the proposed turbine numbers<br />

1 and.2.<br />

Earlsburn wind energy development blades are barely perceptible above the Touch Hills’ ridge.<br />

Earlsburn North would not add a visible effect to the view.<br />

Some of Muirpark’s turbines would be visible next to the Craigengelt turbines while some would be staggered between<br />

the Craigengelt turbines.<br />

The ASDA depot turbine shown on the wireframe in the south is not visible due to the screening vegetation and<br />

land<strong>for</strong>m.<br />

Magnitude of Cumulative Change: Medium<br />

Cumulative turbines would be in direct view with the proposed turbines and there<strong>for</strong>e easily identified.<br />

Due to the long distance to the cumulative wind energy developments they are seen as minor elements in the view.<br />

Craigengelt wind energy development <strong>for</strong>ms an evident skyline element but it does not <strong>for</strong>m the main visual focus of<br />

the view.<br />

Potential increase in developed skyline would be apparent.<br />

The cumulative wind energy developments are positioned on a higher level on the Lowland Hills while the proposed<br />

turbines are on the floodplain of the River Forth, there<strong>for</strong>e the view is focused to the proposed turbines.<br />

No successive views of cumulative wind energy developments possible.<br />

Significance<br />

of Effect:<br />

Medium - where the addition of the wind energy development makes a notable contribution to the<br />

cumulative situation, and its addition is readily apparent.<br />

Viewpoint 4: Alloa Tower<br />

Figure Number: CW-4a; CW – 4b<br />

Grid Reference NS 889 925 Elevation 40m AOD<br />

Bearing 164º Direction of View: South west<br />

LCT: Lowland River Valley LCA: Carse of Forth<br />

Distance to nearest 1.02km<br />

Assessed Magnitude of Medium<br />

Turbine:<br />

Change:<br />

Cumulative effect with Craigengelt WF<br />

Cumulative effect with Earlsburn North<br />

operating WF:<br />

Earlsburn WF<br />

approved WF:<br />

Cumulative effect with Muirpark Cumulative effects: successive visibility<br />

application WF:<br />

Cumulative Effects:<br />

No cumulative visual effects appear in the 75 and 90 degree views.<br />

In a 120 degree view 8 turbines of the Craigengelt wind energy development are clearly visible on the Craigengelt Hill<br />

rising in between Cowie Works and Alloa works chimneys.<br />

Earlsburn wind energy development blades are perceivable above the Touch Hills’ ridge behind the Alloa Works’<br />

chimneys.<br />

Earlsburn North blade tips would be difficult to identify above the Touch Hills’ ridge and there<strong>for</strong>e will not add a visible<br />

effect to the view.<br />

Muirpark turbines would be visible next to the Craigengelt turbines, only the blades breaking the skyline.<br />

The ASDA depot turbine shown on the wireframe in the south is not visible as it is screened behind the Hill of Airth and<br />

associated woodland.<br />

Magnitude of Cumulative Change: Medium<br />

Due to the long distance to the cumulative wind energy developments they are seen as minor elements in the view.<br />

Craigengelt wind energy development <strong>for</strong>ms an evident skyline element but it does not <strong>for</strong>m the main visual focus of<br />

the view.<br />

Potential increase in developed skyline is minimal in successive visibility.<br />

The visible cumulative wind energy developments are positioned on a higher level on the Lowland Hills while the<br />

proposed turbines are on the floodplain of the River Forth, there<strong>for</strong>e the view is focused to the proposed turbines.<br />

Cumulative turbines would be visible in the 120 degree view but would be far apart from the proposed turbines.<br />

No combined views of cumulative wind energy developments possible.<br />

The cumulative effect with the pylons is prevailing in this view.<br />

Significance<br />

of Effect:<br />

Medium - where the addition of the wind energy development makes a notable contribution to the<br />

cumulative situation, and its addition is readily apparent.<br />

November 2010 Chapter 9 Page 106<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!