20.05.2014 Views

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

Forthbank Wind Energy Development - Partnerships for Renewables

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Forthbank</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Species<br />

Conservation<br />

Value at<br />

<strong>Forthbank</strong><br />

Effect Construction Significance Operation Significance<br />

and the presence of other physical obstacles (e.g.<br />

powerlines) 40 . On the basis of this in<strong>for</strong>mation, a<br />

precautionary displacement range of 200m is considered <strong>for</strong><br />

construction also. Given the close proximity of the areas<br />

where goose flocks were observed to the application site<br />

there is a potential <strong>for</strong> construction activities during the winter<br />

to disturb pink-footed geese. This could potentially lead to the<br />

temporary displacement of the birds elsewhere within the<br />

Upper Forth Estuary and surrounding Forth Valley. However,<br />

given the infrequent presence of large pink-footed goose<br />

flocks observed actually <strong>for</strong>aging or roosting within the survey<br />

area disturbance of geese during construction is expected to<br />

be minimal. Furthermore, arable <strong>for</strong>age fields dominate the<br />

Forth Valley at this location while the islands of Alloa Inches<br />

SWT Reserve, located approximately 1.1km upstream of the<br />

application site, are recognised as a traditional pink-footed<br />

goose roosting site. There<strong>for</strong>e, even if birds are displaced<br />

beyond the 200m displacement distance there is sufficient<br />

availability of suitable, and most likely recognised, alternative<br />

<strong>for</strong>aging and roosting habitats to which disturbed birds could<br />

be displaced while still remaining within the Upper Forth<br />

Estuary. Consequently, the impact magnitude is predicted to<br />

be low.<br />

of the Forth Estuary beyond 200m from the turbines in areas<br />

where they were recorded during the surveys. Furthermore, it<br />

is considered that there is sufficient availability of suitable<br />

alternative <strong>for</strong>aging and roosting habitats within the Upper Forth<br />

Estuary as previously mentioned. Consequently, the effect of<br />

any disturbance and displacement of pink-footed geese caused<br />

by the presence of the operational wind energy development is<br />

predicted to be of low magnitude.<br />

Barrier Effect N/A at construction N/A Of the 154 recorded pink-footed goose flights, the vast majority<br />

were of birds commuting up or down the Forth Estuary (or at<br />

least parallel to it). However, at least 53 flights (34%) passed<br />

directly through the <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Area (the area<br />

enclosed by a line on a map joining the outermost turbine rotors<br />

of the wind farm), ,most of which were of birds commuting<br />

between the Forth Estuary and habitats in the surrounding area<br />

(e.g. arable fields to the north east of the site) or beyond as<br />

opposed to between habitats within or immediately adjacent to<br />

the application site. Since the proposed wind energy<br />

development will not restrict the passage of birds along the<br />

river it is concluded that it will not act as a significant barrier to<br />

the majority of pink-footed goose flights which followed this<br />

orientation. Meanwhile, of the flights observed passing over<br />

the proposed wind energy development, it is expected that<br />

birds commuting between <strong>for</strong>aging and roosting grounds in the<br />

wider area will be able to avoid the proposed small scale wind<br />

energy development by either passing over or around it.<br />

Consequently, it is concluded that the proposed wind energy<br />

development is unlikely to act as a significant barrier to the<br />

Minor<br />

November 2010 Chapter 12 Page 54<br />

Copyright <strong>Partnerships</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Renewables</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Co. Ltd 2010 ©

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!