19.11.2014 Views

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION<br />

3.3 COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY FOR CIIP<br />

The challenge of CIIP has garnered suf<strong>fi</strong>cient attention to warrant high level<br />

research and <strong>in</strong>-depth studies by government, bus<strong>in</strong>esses, <strong>in</strong>dustry experts and<br />

academia. This work has resulted <strong>in</strong> some early understand<strong>in</strong>g of the concept of<br />

CIIP and the possible scope of its challenge, as illustrated by the International CIIP<br />

2006 Handbooks (Abele-Wigert and Dunn 2006; Dunn and Mauer 2006). The CIIP<br />

challenge stems from the fact that CIIP strategists are usually faced with an<br />

abundant and diverse set of complex <strong>in</strong>terdependent scenarios. This may leave<br />

different strategy-makers lack<strong>in</strong>g clarity and coherence <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g what are<br />

usually common CIIP goals. Moreover, it <strong>in</strong>creases the likelihood of wast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

resources, time and effort by focus<strong>in</strong>g on imperfectly perceived alternatives. The<br />

worst-case scenario is of different group<strong>in</strong>gs (private, public or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

both) develop<strong>in</strong>g different, contradictory and <strong>in</strong>effective responses to a universal<br />

CIIP challenge. A comprehensive strategy for CIIP aims to avoid those pitfalls by<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g CIIP implementers with coherent direction, guidance and focus when<br />

faced with a multitude of complex choices.<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> is <strong>in</strong> general a rather elusive and abstract concept. The dif<strong>fi</strong>culty <strong>in</strong><br />

formulat<strong>in</strong>g a CIIP strategy is further accentuated by the cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

scalability, rapid evolution and constant diffusion of <strong>in</strong>novations with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Such a fast-paced technological environment<br />

necessitates strategy that is both dynamic and adaptable to changes that occur<br />

regularly over time (Duke Corporate Education 2005). Future strategy tends to<br />

build upon exist<strong>in</strong>g CIIP goals (the end result) and strategy (the means to an end).<br />

Figure 25 depicts how a shift <strong>in</strong> priorities of different groups may force a change<br />

<strong>in</strong> goals and strategy, and how these are then mapped to different dimensions of<br />

each group. This strategic context enables a greater sense of purpose by l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities of different groups to the bigger picture of CIIP. The next subsections<br />

provide an overview of strategy with<strong>in</strong> the different CIIP dimensions shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 25.<br />

Figure III—25 Cont<strong>in</strong>uous lifecycle of strategy on CIIP.<br />

124 NORDREGIO REPORT 2007:5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!