19.11.2014 Views

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER V: GAS<br />

5 NORTH EUROPEAN GAS PIPELINE<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The North European Gas Pipel<strong>in</strong>e (NEGP) is one of the largest subsea gas pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

projects <strong>in</strong> the world and is designed to provide EU Member States with 55 bcm<br />

natural gas from Russia annually, which will be about 8% of the predicted total gas<br />

consumption <strong>in</strong> the EU <strong>in</strong> 2015.<br />

The NEGP is by def<strong>in</strong>ition a critical <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The probability of<br />

terrorist attacks or natural hazards that could damage or even disrupt the pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is rather low. Trawl<strong>in</strong>g and vessels anchor<strong>in</strong>g near the pipel<strong>in</strong>e str<strong>in</strong>gs pose more<br />

of a danger.<br />

The effects of a disruption are local and global. Local effects are gas<br />

leakages and a possible gas explosion at sea level. The global effects are possible<br />

turbulences <strong>in</strong> the gas supply and natural gas market, which could burden<br />

consumers to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent.<br />

A special issue is the chemical and conventional munitions dumped <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>. Experts suggest that build<strong>in</strong>g and operat<strong>in</strong>g the NEGP will not cause<br />

major risks of releas<strong>in</strong>g chemical warfare agents or explosion of conventional<br />

munitions. Nevertheless, this cannot fully be excluded, even if extensive<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations are carried out prior to the lay<strong>in</strong>g and operation of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>vestigations could provide valuable <strong>in</strong>formation about the exist<strong>in</strong>g risk<br />

that should be used <strong>in</strong> the respective <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions (e.g. HELCOM) to<br />

re-evaluate the risk assessment made 15 years ago.<br />

The <strong>Critical</strong> Infrastructure Protection strategy should focus on concepts how<br />

• to secure and to safeguard the pipel<strong>in</strong>e ma<strong>in</strong>ly aga<strong>in</strong>st technological<br />

hazards as trawl<strong>in</strong>g or anchor<strong>in</strong>g ships and<br />

• to have well coord<strong>in</strong>ated and effective emergency response, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

fast detection and repair of damaged parts of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Therefore agreements between the operator Nord Stream and the affected <strong>Baltic</strong><br />

<strong>Sea</strong> states have to be made. S<strong>in</strong>ce the safeguard<strong>in</strong>g work and emergency response<br />

touches on the security <strong>in</strong>terests of the states <strong>in</strong>volved, there seems to be a need to<br />

develop <strong>in</strong>stitutional solutions at political level.<br />

5.2 THE NORTH EUROPEAN GAS PIPELINE<br />

Background<br />

The NEGP is an offshore pipel<strong>in</strong>e under construction from 2005 and 2010 (<strong>fi</strong>rst<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e) / 2012 (second l<strong>in</strong>e) and operated by Nord Stream AG.<br />

NORDREGIO REPORT 2007:5 167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!