Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi
Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi
Towards a Baltic Sea Region Strategy in Critical ... - Helsinki.fi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER V: GAS<br />
5 NORTH EUROPEAN GAS PIPELINE<br />
5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
The North European Gas Pipel<strong>in</strong>e (NEGP) is one of the largest subsea gas pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
projects <strong>in</strong> the world and is designed to provide EU Member States with 55 bcm<br />
natural gas from Russia annually, which will be about 8% of the predicted total gas<br />
consumption <strong>in</strong> the EU <strong>in</strong> 2015.<br />
The NEGP is by def<strong>in</strong>ition a critical <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The probability of<br />
terrorist attacks or natural hazards that could damage or even disrupt the pipel<strong>in</strong>e<br />
is rather low. Trawl<strong>in</strong>g and vessels anchor<strong>in</strong>g near the pipel<strong>in</strong>e str<strong>in</strong>gs pose more<br />
of a danger.<br />
The effects of a disruption are local and global. Local effects are gas<br />
leakages and a possible gas explosion at sea level. The global effects are possible<br />
turbulences <strong>in</strong> the gas supply and natural gas market, which could burden<br />
consumers to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent.<br />
A special issue is the chemical and conventional munitions dumped <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>. Experts suggest that build<strong>in</strong>g and operat<strong>in</strong>g the NEGP will not cause<br />
major risks of releas<strong>in</strong>g chemical warfare agents or explosion of conventional<br />
munitions. Nevertheless, this cannot fully be excluded, even if extensive<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations are carried out prior to the lay<strong>in</strong>g and operation of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
These <strong>in</strong>vestigations could provide valuable <strong>in</strong>formation about the exist<strong>in</strong>g risk<br />
that should be used <strong>in</strong> the respective <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions (e.g. HELCOM) to<br />
re-evaluate the risk assessment made 15 years ago.<br />
The <strong>Critical</strong> Infrastructure Protection strategy should focus on concepts how<br />
• to secure and to safeguard the pipel<strong>in</strong>e ma<strong>in</strong>ly aga<strong>in</strong>st technological<br />
hazards as trawl<strong>in</strong>g or anchor<strong>in</strong>g ships and<br />
• to have well coord<strong>in</strong>ated and effective emergency response, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
fast detection and repair of damaged parts of the pipel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Therefore agreements between the operator Nord Stream and the affected <strong>Baltic</strong><br />
<strong>Sea</strong> states have to be made. S<strong>in</strong>ce the safeguard<strong>in</strong>g work and emergency response<br />
touches on the security <strong>in</strong>terests of the states <strong>in</strong>volved, there seems to be a need to<br />
develop <strong>in</strong>stitutional solutions at political level.<br />
5.2 THE NORTH EUROPEAN GAS PIPELINE<br />
Background<br />
The NEGP is an offshore pipel<strong>in</strong>e under construction from 2005 and 2010 (<strong>fi</strong>rst<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e) / 2012 (second l<strong>in</strong>e) and operated by Nord Stream AG.<br />
NORDREGIO REPORT 2007:5 167