01.12.2014 Views

WSHPDR_2013_Final_Report-updated_version

WSHPDR_2013_Final_Report-updated_version

WSHPDR_2013_Final_Report-updated_version

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

involving certain low-impact situations or exemptions<br />

issued by FERC, nor available for rehabilitation of<br />

existing power projects unless the current incremental<br />

hydro criteria are met.<br />

7. Absence of designs specific to small hydropower.<br />

Industry would benefit from new designs/materials for<br />

drop-in turbines.<br />

Other research and development issues include a need<br />

for new technology that addresses the engineering<br />

and economics of small hydropower. 1 Such new<br />

technologies could minimize environmental impacts<br />

and could potentially lead to greater ease in obtaining<br />

regulatory approvals.<br />

Note<br />

i. Hydrokinetic technologies use the power of moving<br />

water, such as ocean waves or currents in canals,<br />

rivers, and tidal channels, to produce electricity.<br />

References<br />

1. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (2012). The World<br />

Factbook. Available from<br />

www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook.<br />

2. U.S. Department of Energy, Database for State<br />

Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (2012).<br />

Quantitative Renewable Portfolio Standard data for<br />

2012. Available from www.dsireusa.org.<br />

3. International Energy Agency (2011). Key World<br />

Energy Statistics 2011. Paris. Available from:<br />

www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publicatio<br />

n/key_world_energy_stats.pdf.<br />

4. Boden, T.A., G. Marland, and R.J. Andres (2011).<br />

Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2<br />

Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis<br />

Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S.<br />

Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.<br />

Available from<br />

http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_usa.html.<br />

5. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National<br />

Hydropower Association and Hydropower Research<br />

Foundation (2010). Summary <strong>Report</strong> of the 2010<br />

Technology Summit Meeting on Small Hydropower.<br />

Washington D.C., USA.<br />

6. Smith, B.T (2011). U.S. Hydropower: Fleet and<br />

Resource Assessments. Paper presented at the<br />

National Hydropower Association Annual Conference.<br />

Washington, D.C, April.<br />

7. Campbell, J. (2010). Small Hydro and Low-Head<br />

Hydro Power Technologies and Prospects, March.<br />

Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service,<br />

United States Government. Available from<br />

http://nepinstitute.org/get/CRS_<strong>Report</strong>s/CRS_Energy/<br />

Renewable_Fuels/Small_hydro_and_Low-head_hydro<br />

_power.pdf.<br />

8. Hall, D. G., Verdin, K.L. & Lee, R.D (2012).<br />

Assessment of Natural Stream Sites for Hydroelectric<br />

Dams in the Pacific Northwest Region. Prepared for<br />

217<br />

the U.S. Department of Energy.. Idaho: Idaho National<br />

Laboratory. Available from<br />

www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/53941<br />

34.pdf.<br />

9. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of<br />

Reclamation, Power Resources Office (2011).<br />

Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing<br />

Reclamation Facilities. Washington D.C.: United States<br />

Department of the Interior Available from<br />

www.usbr.gov/<br />

10. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2012). An<br />

Assessment of Energy Potential at Non-Powered Dams<br />

in the United States <strong>Report</strong>. Prepared for the U.S.<br />

Department of Energy Wind and Water Power<br />

Program. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States.<br />

Available from<br />

http://nhaap.ornl.gov/system/files/NHAAP_NPD_FY11<br />

_<strong>Final</strong>_<strong>Report</strong>.pdf.<br />

11. U.S Department of Energy (2011). An Assessment<br />

of Energy Potential at Non-Powered Dams in the<br />

United States. Oak Ridge: National Hydropower Asset<br />

Assessment Program (NHAAP). Available from<br />

http://nhaap.ornl.gov/content/non-powered-dam-pot<br />

ential<br />

12. World Energy Council (2010). Survey of Energy<br />

Resources 2010. London: World Energy Council.<br />

Available from<br />

www.worldenergy.org/publications/3040.asp.<br />

13. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (n.d.).<br />

Guide to Developing Small/Low-Impact Hydropower<br />

Projects. Washington D.C.: FERC. Available from<br />

www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/gen-info/licensi<br />

ng/small-low-impact/small-hydro.pdf Accessed July<br />

201214. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2012).<br />

What is a Qualifying Facility?, February. Washington<br />

D.C.: FERC. Available from<br />

www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/gen-info/qual-fac/w<br />

hat-is.asp.<br />

15. National Hydropower Association (2010). Small<br />

Hydro Council Initial <strong>Report</strong>. Washington D.C. Available<br />

from www.hydro.org.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!