Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III - EKN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OAJ “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” ПТЭО «Комплексное обустройство месторождения Сургиль с извлечением ценных компонентов» Impact on surface water is indirect and is related to the withdrawal of water for industrial and drinking purposes. Duration of exposure - the period of operation of the Project facilities. Temporal dynamics of water removal to be permanent fresh water. The area of distribution in the case of sewage on the evaporation ponds are limited to an area of evaporation ponds. Soils study region are major targets of exposure. At the same time the intensity of the impact is negligible, is periodic, increasing by accidental releases. Duration of exposure will not change because This value depends on the time of operation facilities. The impact will be continuous. Distribution area will not increase. Nature of the impact will remain as before, right. According to the calculations of atmospheric pollution and the experience of similar productions, it can be stated that the staff of the enterprise will breathe the air quality that meets sanitary standards at work sites, approved by the Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan. Soils, site investigation works and the surrounding area is an area of natural fertility is not high (it is necessary irrigation). Slight humus content is not allow to develop higher forms of vegetation. Wind erosion and the total number of dusty particles is one of the reasons for soil degradation. Based on the analysis of the soil in the impact zone of the object, we can conclude: - Construction of the facility is on land not suitable for planting crops. - The main impact of an object due to additional soil disturbance along the pipeline route. Due to the remoteness, surface waters are not objects of impact (only for the removal of water). At the other components of the environment (water, flora, fauna) under the proposed project interventions to prevent or mitigate the identified potential adverse impacts, a significant influence in the operation of the object is not assumed. The process of construction and operation of the planned facility may also have an impact on changes in socio-economic living conditions of the population of nearby settlements. The proposed design solutions are the proof of environmental performance of the project related to improving the environment or its individual components, as well as focus on prevention of environmental risks. Population living at a distance from the production facilities will not feel much change due to local nature of this project. Direct impact on water bodies do not have waste water. Possible contamination of groundwater by filtering water evaporation ponds, but the long-term operation of the bottom of the ponds covered with a layer of sediment, which prevents the filtration process. Also, the filtering process prevents the composition of groundwater with high density due to high salinity. The absence of organic contamination in the analysis of Книга 2. Часть 2. Проект ЗВОС по строительству ГХК 96
OAJ “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” ПТЭО «Комплексное обустройство месторождения Сургиль с извлечением ценных компонентов» available water monitoring wells confirms the assumption that there is no contamination of groundwater. Based on the foregoing comprehensive assessment of environmental conditions in the area of the planned construction showed the following results. Impact on the atmosphere will increase slightly, especially for nitrogen oxides, however, in general, the functioning of the designed object will not change drastically existing level of air pollution. Impact on soil and vegetation will be expressed in violation of the integrity of the land cover in the implementation of civil works and laying of pipelines. Does not exclude the possibility of accidental spills of condensate with a burst pipe. After completion of construction works on laying the pipeline all the land reserved for temporary use, will be reclaimed. For reclamation in the budget incorporated the appropriate means. Spills, whose probability is extremely low due to the constructive execution pipeline does not pose a significant risk to the environment (soil, air). Accidents are subject to immediate elimination of the contaminated soil must be removed, the site of the accident being a complete restoration. Thus, we can say that the design solutions include respect for the soil and soils, while conserving the agricultural qualities. After the processes of vegetation restoration in a short time completely recovered. Accordingly, the animals after construction have the opportunity to return to their habitat. Barriers to migration routes of animals Planned construction is not installed. Landscape change (take industrial character), but not too much. Given the above, the impact on health service staff and people from MCC almost felt not to be. Thus, the overall forecast impact on the OPS is favorable, the planned construction will make its contribution to environmental (natural resources). Книга 2. Часть 2. Проект ЗВОС по строительству ГХК 97
Page 1:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III App
Page 5 and 6:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III Iss
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III Fig
Page 11 and 12:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III Tab
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III A.3
Page 21 and 22:
Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III A.3
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
“Management of Ustyurt GCC infras
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
“O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” PC PFS “Su
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Книга 2. Часть 2. Про
Page 187 and 188:
OAJ “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” ПТЭО
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Газопровод L=115 ,0 km d=
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230: OAJ “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” ПТЭО
Page 279: OAJ “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” ПТЭО
Page 285 and 286: NATIONAL HOLDING COMPANY «UZBEKNEF
Page 287 and 288: “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” open joint-s
Page 327: “O’ZLITINEFTGAZ” open joint-s
show all

Surgil ESIA Report - Volume III - EKN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?