15.01.2015 Views

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4. RESULTS<br />

Overburden<br />

Extension in the overburden<br />

Side<br />

burden<br />

Reservoir is contracting<br />

Compression<br />

in the side<br />

burden<br />

(a)<br />

Overburden<br />

Compression in the overburden<br />

Side<br />

burden<br />

Reservoir is inflating<br />

Extension<br />

in the side<br />

burden<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 5.11: Cartoon illustrating stress arching during (a) production <strong>and</strong> (b) injection. During<br />

production, the shrinkage <strong>of</strong> the reservoir induces stretching in the overburden, <strong>and</strong> compression<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sideburden as it supports the load. The reverse happens during injection, with compression<br />

in the overburden <strong>and</strong> extension in the sideburden.<br />

compacts with decreasing pore pressure, the overburden should subside. However, the weight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

overburden is supported by the sideburden, <strong>and</strong> so it does not subside. Instead there is extension in<br />

the overburden, while the sideburden is compacted by the extra weight that it is required to support.<br />

This process is illustrated in Figure 5.11a. With these simple injection models I have demonstrated<br />

the inverse process occurring during inflation. The increase in pressure inside the reservoir pushes the<br />

top <strong>of</strong> the reservoir upwards. However, the overburden is not lifted as it is connected mechanically to<br />

the sideburden. As a result, there is extension in the sideburden, while the overburden is compressed.<br />

This is illustrated in Figure 5.11b.<br />

In Figure 5.12 I plot the change in vertical effective stress for the small, s<strong>of</strong>t reservoir <strong>and</strong> for the<br />

stiff, extensive reservoir. For the stiff, extensive case, σ ′ 3 decreases due to the pore pressure increase,<br />

but there is no stress change outside the reservoir. There is no stress arching. In contrast, for the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t, short case, although the effective stress inside the reservoir decreases, it does not decrease by as<br />

much. This is because part <strong>of</strong> the load is supported by the overburden, which compacts, <strong>and</strong> by the<br />

sideburden, which extends. Stress arching has occurred.<br />

The γ 3 parameter describes the extent to which this process is occurring. I have found that<br />

arching is likely to occur when the reservoir is s<strong>of</strong>t in comparison to the over- <strong>and</strong> sideburdens. This<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!