15.01.2015 Views

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 1.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In Chapter 6 I develop a microstructural model to map changes in stress predicted by geomechanical<br />

models into changes in elastic stiffness (from which seismic velocities can be computed). This model is<br />

fully anisotropic <strong>and</strong> includes the nonlinear response <strong>of</strong> velocity to stress changes. I have calibrated this<br />

model with over 200 stress-velocity measurements from the literature. In Chapter 7 I demonstrate<br />

this approach by forward modelling the changes in P-wave travel time <strong>and</strong> shear wave anisotropy<br />

from the simple models developed in Chapter 5, with the intention <strong>of</strong> seeing whether different styles<br />

<strong>of</strong> geomechanical deformation can be differentiated using seismic observations.<br />

Through Chapters 5 to 7 I have outlined a workflow to go from the development <strong>of</strong> a geomechanical<br />

model to the prediction <strong>of</strong> changes to seismic properties caused by deformation. In Chapter 8 I bring<br />

this workflow together <strong>and</strong> demonstrate it in its entirety by developing geomechanical models <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Weyburn reservoir. By comparing predicted microseismic event locations with observations made in<br />

Chapter 2, <strong>and</strong> splitting predictions with measurements made in Chapter 3, the geomechanical models<br />

can be groundtruthed, <strong>and</strong> the most appropriate models selected. These geomechanical models aid<br />

the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the microseismic observations made in Chapters 2 <strong>and</strong> 3. They help to show<br />

that the injection <strong>of</strong> CO 2 at Weyburn can be understood, <strong>and</strong> that there is little risk <strong>of</strong> leakage.<br />

Finally, in Chapter 9 I present the main conclusions <strong>of</strong> this project, highlighting the significant<br />

contributions made towards the improved underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> geological storage <strong>of</strong> CO 2 , <strong>and</strong> I also make<br />

recommendations for future work.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!