BIBLIOGRAPHY Nur, A. M., Simmons, G., 1969. The effect <strong>of</strong> saturation on velocity in low porosity rocks. Earth <strong>and</strong> Planetary Science Letters 7, 183–193. Ol<strong>of</strong>sson, B., Probert, T., Kommedal, J. H., Barkved, O., 2003. Azimuthal anisotropy from the Valhall 4C 3D survey. The Leading Edge 22, 1228–1235. Onuma, T., Ohkawa, S., 2009. Detection <strong>of</strong> surface deformation related with CO 2 injection by DInSAR at In Salah, Algeria. Energy Procedia 1, 2177–2184. Pal-Bathija, A., Batzle, M., 2007. An experimental study <strong>of</strong> the dilation factor in s<strong>and</strong>stones under anisotropic stress conditions. SEG Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Abstracts 26, 1545–1549. Pendrigh, N. M., 2004. Core analysis <strong>and</strong> correlation to seismic attributes, Weyburn Midale Pool, Southeastern Saskatchewan. in Summary <strong>of</strong> investigations Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2004-4.1. Pointer, T., Liu, E., Hudson, J. A., 2000. Seismic wave propagation in cracked porous media. Geophysical Journal International 142, 199–231. Prioul, R., Bakulin, A., Bakulin, V., 2004. Non-linear rock physics model for estimation <strong>of</strong> 3D subsurface stress in anisotropic formations: Theory <strong>and</strong> laboratory verification. Geophysics 69, 415–425. Rathore, J. S., Fjaer, E., Holt, R. M., Renlie, L., 1994. P- <strong>and</strong> S-wave anisotropy <strong>of</strong> a synthetic s<strong>and</strong>stone with controlled crack geometry. Geophysical Prospecting 43, 711–728. Rial, J. A., Elkibbi, M., Yang, M., 2005. Shear-wave splitting as a tool for the characterization <strong>of</strong> geothermal fractured reservoirs: lessons learned. Geothermics 34, 365–385. Rojas, M. S., 2005. Elastic rock properties <strong>of</strong> tight gas s<strong>and</strong>stones for reservoir characterization at Rulison Field, Colorado. Master’s thesis, Colorado School <strong>of</strong> Mines, Golden, Colorado. Rümpker, G., Tommasi, A., Kendall, J.-M., 1999. Numerical simulations <strong>of</strong> depth-dependent anisotropy <strong>and</strong> frequency-dependent wave propagation effects. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 104, 23141–23153. Rutledge, J. T., Phillips, W. S., Mayerh<strong>of</strong>er, M. J., 2004. Faulting induced by forced fluid injection <strong>and</strong> fluid flow forced by faulting: An interpretation <strong>of</strong> hydraulic fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the Seismological Society <strong>of</strong> America 94 (5), 1817–1830. Rutqvist, J., Vasco, D. W., Myer, L., 2009. Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis <strong>of</strong> CO 2 injection at In Salah, Algeria. Energy Procedia 1, 1847–1854. Sarout, J., Molez, L., Gueguen, Y., Hoteit, N., 2007. Shale dynamic properties <strong>and</strong> anisotropy under triaxial loading: Experimental <strong>and</strong> theoretical investigations. Physics <strong>and</strong> Chemistry <strong>of</strong> the Earth 32, 896–906. 182
BIBLIOGRAPHY Sayers, C. M., 2002. Stress-dependent elastic anisotropy <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stones. Geophysical Prospecting 50, 85–95. Sayers, C. M., 2007. Asymmetry in the time-lapse seismic response to injection <strong>and</strong> depletion. Geophysical Prospecting 55, 1–7. Sayers, C. M., Kachanov, M., 1995. Microcrack induced elastic wave anisotropy <strong>of</strong> brittle rocks. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 100, 4149–4156. Sayers, C. M., Schutjens, P. T. M., 2007. An introduction to reservoir geomechanics. The Leading Edge 26, 597–601. Schoenberg, M., Sayers, C. M., 1995. Seismic anisotropy <strong>of</strong> fractured rock. Geophysics 60 (1), 204–211. Scott, T. E., Abousleiman, Y., 2004. Acoustical imaging <strong>and</strong> mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t rock <strong>and</strong> marine sediments. Tech. Rep. 15302, Dept <strong>of</strong> Energy, http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/purl.cover.jsppurl=/828441-uiLUfO/native/. Segura, J. M., Fisher, Q. J., Crook, A. J. L., Dutko, M., Yu, J., Skachkov, S., Angus, D. A., Verdon, J. P., Kendall, J.-M., 2010. Reservoir stress path characterization <strong>and</strong> its implications for fluid-flow production simulations. sub judice, Petroleum Geosciences. Shapiro, S. A., Kaselow, A., 2005. Porosity <strong>and</strong> elastic anisotropy <strong>of</strong> rocks under tectonic stress <strong>and</strong> pore-pressure changes. Geophysics 70 (5), N27–N38. Silver, P. G., Chan, W. W. J., 1991. Shear-wave splitting <strong>and</strong> subcontinental mantle deformation. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 96, 16429–16454. Simmons, G., Brace, W. F., 1965. Comparison <strong>of</strong> static <strong>and</strong> dynamic measurements <strong>of</strong> compressibility <strong>of</strong> rocks. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 70 (22), 5649–5656. Sminchak, J., Gupta, N., Byrer, C., Bergman, P., 2002. Issues related to seismic activity induced by the injection <strong>of</strong> CO 2 in deep saline aquifers. Journal <strong>of</strong> Energy & Environmental Research 2, 32–46. Staples, R., Ita, J., Burrell, R., Nash, R., 2007. <strong>Monitoring</strong> pressure depletion <strong>and</strong> improving geomechanical models <strong>of</strong> the Shearwater field using 4D seismic. The Leading Edge 26, 636–642. T<strong>and</strong>on, G. P., Weng, G. J., 1984. The effect <strong>of</strong> aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> inclusions on the elastic properties <strong>of</strong> unidirectionally aligned composites. Polymer Composites 5 (4), 327–333. Teanby, N. A., Kendall, J.-M., Jones, R. H., Barkved, O., 2004a. Stress-induced temporal variations in seismic anisotropy observed in microseismic data. Geophysical Journal International 156, 459–466. Teanby, N. A., Kendall, J.-M., van der Baan, M., 2004b. Automation <strong>of</strong> shear-wave splitting measurements using cluster analysis. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the Seismological Society <strong>of</strong> America 94 (2), 453–463. Terzaghi, K., 1943. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York. 183
- Page 1:
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomech
- Page 5 and 6:
Abstract Capture of CO 2 produced a
- Page 7 and 8:
Author’s Declaration I declare th
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments There are many thin
- Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents Abstract Author
- Page 13 and 14:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.4 Results . . .
- Page 15 and 16:
Preface ‘Research is not an end i
- Page 17 and 18:
6. D. Angus, J-M. Kendall, J.P. Ver
- Page 19 and 20:
1 Introduction A technology push ap
- Page 21 and 22:
1.2. CCS OVERVIEW Figure 1.2: CCS s
- Page 23 and 24:
1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW for CO 2 to be
- Page 25 and 26:
1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW as microseismi
- Page 27 and 28:
2 The Weyburn CO 2 injection projec
- Page 29 and 30:
2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING Fig
- Page 31 and 32:
2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING N F
- Page 33 and 34:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 35 and 36:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 37 and 38:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Nor
- Page 39 and 40:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Fig
- Page 41 and 42:
2.5. DISCUSSION 500 1000 1100 North
- Page 43 and 44:
2.6. SUMMARY 2.6 Summary • CO 2 s
- Page 45 and 46:
3 Inverting shear-wave splitting me
- Page 47 and 48:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD the additiona
- Page 49 and 50:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 1. P-wave inc
- Page 51 and 52:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 180 160 140 C
- Page 53 and 54:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 2800 2800 260
- Page 55 and 56:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD Loop over γ,
- Page 57 and 58:
20 10 5 5 1 20 30 40 80 100 60 40 1
- Page 59 and 60:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN th
- Page 61 and 62:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN ei
- Page 63 and 64:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN ξ
- Page 65 and 66:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN da
- Page 67 and 68:
4 2 2 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYB
- Page 69 and 70:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.5. DISCUSSION
- Page 71 and 72:
3.6. SUMMARY 3.6 Summary • I have
- Page 73 and 74:
4 A comparison of microseismic moni
- Page 75 and 76:
4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 2400 Velocity
- Page 77 and 78:
4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 200 150 Northi
- Page 79 and 80:
4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES Pressure (MPa
- Page 81 and 82:
4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES 160 140 120 N
- Page 83 and 84:
4.4. SHEAR WAVE SPLITTING 50 −3 E
- Page 85 and 86:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION In
- Page 87 and 88:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION 6
- Page 89 and 90:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION of
- Page 91 and 92:
4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAVE S
- Page 93 and 94:
1 1 5 5 30 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF S
- Page 95 and 96:
80 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAV
- Page 97 and 98:
2 3 3.5 4 5 2 1.8 1.4 4 4.6. INTERP
- Page 99 and 100:
4.7. DISCUSSION 4.7 Discussion The
- Page 101 and 102:
pressure, P fl σ ′ ij = σ ij
- Page 103 and 104:
5.2. EFFECTIVE STRESS AND STRESS PA
- Page 105 and 106:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING 5.3.1 Flui
- Page 107 and 108:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING MORE FLUID
- Page 109 and 110:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING (a) (b) Fi
- Page 111 and 112:
5.4. RESULTS 0 500 1000 Depth (m) 1
- Page 113 and 114:
5.4. RESULTS 1 0.9 0.8 Soft Med Sti
- Page 115 and 116:
5.4. RESULTS Overburden Extension i
- Page 117 and 118:
5.4. RESULTS 1z:100x:100y 1z:100x:5
- Page 119 and 120:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT 1 0.9 0.8 Soft
- Page 121 and 122:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT Figure 5.17: Ma
- Page 123 and 124:
6 Generating anisotropic seismic mo
- Page 125 and 126:
6.2. STRESS-SENSITIVE ROCK PHYSICS
- Page 127 and 128:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 129 and 130:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 131 and 132:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 133 and 134:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 135 and 136:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 137 and 138:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 139 and 140:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 141 and 142:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 143 and 144:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 145 and 146:
6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 147 and 148:
6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 149 and 150: 6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 151 and 152: 6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 153 and 154: 7 Forward modelling of seismic prop
- Page 155 and 156: 7.2. SEISMODEL c⃝ WORKFLOW time s
- Page 157 and 158: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 159 and 160: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 161 and 162: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 163 and 164: 7.4. SUMMARY 7.4 Summary • I have
- Page 165 and 166: 8 Linking geomechanical modelling a
- Page 167 and 168: 8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Layer Thickn
- Page 169 and 170: 8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Unit E (GPa)
- Page 171 and 172: 8.3. RESULTS Marl Vugg 0.8 0.8 Norm
- Page 173 and 174: 8.3. RESULTS 15 10 Injector Produce
- Page 175 and 176: 8.3. RESULTS 2000 15 2000 15 1500 1
- Page 177 and 178: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 8.4 A softe
- Page 179 and 180: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 15 200
- Page 181 and 182: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 Max SW
- Page 183 and 184: 8.5. DISCUSSION pore-pressure being
- Page 185 and 186: 8.6. SUMMARY 8.6 Summary • I appl
- Page 187 and 188: 9 Conclusions Geological storage wi
- Page 189 and 190: calibrate. This model has been cali
- Page 191 and 192: 9.1. NOVEL CONTRIBUTIONS techniques
- Page 193 and 194: 9.2. FUTURE WORK Finally, the compa
- Page 195 and 196: Bibliography Abt, D. L., Fischer, K
- Page 197 and 198: BIBLIOGRAPHY Gassmann, F., 1951. Ub
- Page 199: BIBLIOGRAPHY Kendall, J.-M., Pilido
- Page 203 and 204: BIBLIOGRAPHY White, D., 2009. Monit
- Page 205 and 206: A List of Symbols The table below l
- Page 207 and 208: B In Support of Carbon Capture and
- Page 209 and 210: Both China and India are aggressive
- Page 211 and 212: Utsira rock properties vary signifi