BIBLIOGRAPHY Holt, R. M., Fjaer, E., Nes, O. M., Stenebråten, J. F., 2008. Strain sensitivity <strong>of</strong> wave velocities in sediments <strong>and</strong> sedimentary rocks. 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium. Hornby, B. E., 1998. Experimental laboratory determination <strong>of</strong> the dynamic elastic prooperties <strong>of</strong> wet, drained shales. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 103 (B12), 29945–29964. Horne, S., MacBeth, C., 1994. Inversion for seismic anisotropy using genetic algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting 42, 953–974. Hudson, J. A., 1981. Wave speeds <strong>and</strong> attenuation <strong>of</strong> elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal <strong>of</strong> the Royal Astronomical Society 64, 133–150. Hudson, J. A., 2000. The effect <strong>of</strong> fluid pressure on wave speeds in a cracked solid. Geophysical Journal International 143, 302–310. Hudson, J. A., Liu, E., Crampin, S., 1996. The mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> materials with interconnected cracks <strong>and</strong> pores. Geophysical Journal International 124, 105–112. Hudson, J. A., Pointer, T., Liu, E., 2001. Effective medium theories for fluid saturated materials with aligned cracks. Geophysical Prospecting 49, 509–522. Jimenez Gomez, J. A., 2006. <strong>Geomechanical</strong> performance assessment <strong>of</strong> CO 2 - EOR geological storage projects. Ph.D. thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta. Jizba, D. L., 1991. Mechanical <strong>and</strong> acoustical properties <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong> shales. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University. Johnson, J. W., Nitao, J. J., Steefel, C. I., Knauss, K. G., 2001. Reactive transport modelling <strong>of</strong> geologic CO 2 sequestration in saline aquifers: The influence <strong>of</strong> intraaquifer shales <strong>and</strong> the relative effectiveness <strong>of</strong> structural, solubility, <strong>and</strong> mineral trapping during prograde <strong>and</strong> retrograde sequestration. NETL Proceedings, First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration. Johnston, J. E., Christensen, N. I., 1995. Seismic anisotropy <strong>of</strong> shales. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 100 (B4), 5991–6003. Jones, G. A., Raymer, D., Chambers, K., Kendall, J. M., 2010. Improved microseismic event location by inclusion <strong>of</strong> a priori dip particle motion: a case study from Ek<strong>of</strong>isk. Geophysical Prospecting 58, 727–737. Jones, R. H., Stewart, R. C., 1997. A method for determining significant structures in a cloud <strong>of</strong> earthquakes. Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research 102, 8245–8254. Kendall, J.-M., Fisher, Q. J., Covey Crump, S., Maddock, J., Carter, A., Hall, S. A., Wookey, J., Valcke, S., Casey, M., Lloyd, G., Ben Ismail, W., 2007. Seismic anisotropy as an indicator <strong>of</strong> reservoir quality <strong>of</strong> siliclastic rocks. In: Jolley, S., Barr, D., Walsh, J., Knipe, R. (Eds.), Structurally complex reservoirs. Vol. 292. Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London Special Publication, pp. 123–136. 180
BIBLIOGRAPHY Kendall, J.-M., Pilidou, S., Keir, D., Bastow, I. D., Stuart, G. W., Ayele, A., 2006. Mantle upwellings, melt migration <strong>and</strong> magma assisted rifting in Africa: Insights from seismic anisotropy. In: Yirgu, G., Ebinger, C. J., Maguire, P. K. H. (Eds.), Structure <strong>and</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> the rift systems within the Afar volcanic province, Northeast Africa. Vol. 259. Geological Society <strong>of</strong> London Special Publication, pp. 57–74. Kendall, J.-M., Stuart, G. W., Ebinger, C. J., Bastow, I. D., Keir, D., 2005. Magma assisted rifting in Ethiopia. Nature 433, 146–148. King, M. S., 1966. Wave velocities in rocks as a functoin <strong>of</strong> changes in overburden pressure <strong>and</strong> pore fluid saturants. Geophysics 31, 50–73. King, M. S., 2002. Elastic wave propagation in <strong>and</strong> permeability for rocks with multiple parallel fractures. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Rock Mechanics <strong>and</strong> Mining Science 39, 1033–1043. Kuster, G. T., Toksoz, M. N., 1974. Velocity <strong>and</strong> attenuation <strong>of</strong> seismic waves in two-phase media: Part I. Theoretical formulations. Geophysics 39 (5), 587–606. Liu, E., Crampin, S., Booth, D. C., 1989. Shear-wave splitting in cross-hole surveys: Geophysics 54 (1), 57–65. Modeling. Lo, T.-W., Coyner, K. B., Toksoz, M. N., 1986. Experimental determination <strong>of</strong> elastic anisctropy <strong>of</strong> Berea s<strong>and</strong>stone, Chicopee shale, <strong>and</strong> Chelmsford granite. Geophysics 51 (1), 164–171. Longuemare, P., Mainguy, M., Lemonnier, P., Onaisi, A., Gerard, C., Koutsabeloulis, N., 2002. Geomechanics in reservoir simulation: Overview <strong>of</strong> coupling methods <strong>and</strong> field case study. Oil <strong>and</strong> Gas Science <strong>and</strong> Technology 57 (5), 471–483. MacBeth, C., 2004. A classification for the pressure-sensitivity properties <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>and</strong>stone rock frame. Geophysics 69 (2), 497–510. MacBeth, C., Schuett, H., 2007. The stress dependent elastic properties <strong>of</strong> thermally induced micr<strong>of</strong>ractures in aeolian Rotliegend S<strong>and</strong>stone. Geophysical Prospecting 55, 323–332. Maddock, J., 2006. Missing title. Ph.D. thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds. Makse, H. A., Gl<strong>and</strong>, N., Johnson, D. L., Schwartz, L. M., 1999. Why effective medium theory fails in granular materials. Physical Review Letters 83 (24), 5070–5073. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., 1992. The Rock Physics H<strong>and</strong>book. Cambridge University Press. Maxwell, S. C., Shemeta, J., Campbell, E., Quirk, D., 2008. <strong>Microseismic</strong> deformation rate monitoring, SPE 116596. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference. Mink<strong>of</strong>f, S. E., Stone, C. M., Bryant, S., Peszynska, M., 2004. Coupled geomechanics <strong>and</strong> flow simulation for time-lapse seismic modeling. Geophysics 61 (1), 200–211. 181
- Page 1:
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomech
- Page 5 and 6:
Abstract Capture of CO 2 produced a
- Page 7 and 8:
Author’s Declaration I declare th
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments There are many thin
- Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents Abstract Author
- Page 13 and 14:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.4 Results . . .
- Page 15 and 16:
Preface ‘Research is not an end i
- Page 17 and 18:
6. D. Angus, J-M. Kendall, J.P. Ver
- Page 19 and 20:
1 Introduction A technology push ap
- Page 21 and 22:
1.2. CCS OVERVIEW Figure 1.2: CCS s
- Page 23 and 24:
1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW for CO 2 to be
- Page 25 and 26:
1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW as microseismi
- Page 27 and 28:
2 The Weyburn CO 2 injection projec
- Page 29 and 30:
2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING Fig
- Page 31 and 32:
2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING N F
- Page 33 and 34:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 35 and 36:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 37 and 38:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Nor
- Page 39 and 40:
2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Fig
- Page 41 and 42:
2.5. DISCUSSION 500 1000 1100 North
- Page 43 and 44:
2.6. SUMMARY 2.6 Summary • CO 2 s
- Page 45 and 46:
3 Inverting shear-wave splitting me
- Page 47 and 48:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD the additiona
- Page 49 and 50:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 1. P-wave inc
- Page 51 and 52:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 180 160 140 C
- Page 53 and 54:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD 2800 2800 260
- Page 55 and 56:
3.2. INVERSION METHOD Loop over γ,
- Page 57 and 58:
20 10 5 5 1 20 30 40 80 100 60 40 1
- Page 59 and 60:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN th
- Page 61 and 62:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN ei
- Page 63 and 64:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN ξ
- Page 65 and 66:
3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN da
- Page 67 and 68:
4 2 2 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYB
- Page 69 and 70:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.5. DISCUSSION
- Page 71 and 72:
3.6. SUMMARY 3.6 Summary • I have
- Page 73 and 74:
4 A comparison of microseismic moni
- Page 75 and 76:
4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 2400 Velocity
- Page 77 and 78:
4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 200 150 Northi
- Page 79 and 80:
4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES Pressure (MPa
- Page 81 and 82:
4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES 160 140 120 N
- Page 83 and 84:
4.4. SHEAR WAVE SPLITTING 50 −3 E
- Page 85 and 86:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION In
- Page 87 and 88:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION 6
- Page 89 and 90:
4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION of
- Page 91 and 92:
4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAVE S
- Page 93 and 94:
1 1 5 5 30 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF S
- Page 95 and 96:
80 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAV
- Page 97 and 98:
2 3 3.5 4 5 2 1.8 1.4 4 4.6. INTERP
- Page 99 and 100:
4.7. DISCUSSION 4.7 Discussion The
- Page 101 and 102:
pressure, P fl σ ′ ij = σ ij
- Page 103 and 104:
5.2. EFFECTIVE STRESS AND STRESS PA
- Page 105 and 106:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING 5.3.1 Flui
- Page 107 and 108:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING MORE FLUID
- Page 109 and 110:
5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING (a) (b) Fi
- Page 111 and 112:
5.4. RESULTS 0 500 1000 Depth (m) 1
- Page 113 and 114:
5.4. RESULTS 1 0.9 0.8 Soft Med Sti
- Page 115 and 116:
5.4. RESULTS Overburden Extension i
- Page 117 and 118:
5.4. RESULTS 1z:100x:100y 1z:100x:5
- Page 119 and 120:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT 1 0.9 0.8 Soft
- Page 121 and 122:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT Figure 5.17: Ma
- Page 123 and 124:
6 Generating anisotropic seismic mo
- Page 125 and 126:
6.2. STRESS-SENSITIVE ROCK PHYSICS
- Page 127 and 128:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 129 and 130:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 131 and 132:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 133 and 134:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 135 and 136:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 137 and 138:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 139 and 140:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 141 and 142:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 143 and 144:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 145 and 146:
6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 147 and 148: 6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 149 and 150: 6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 151 and 152: 6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 153 and 154: 7 Forward modelling of seismic prop
- Page 155 and 156: 7.2. SEISMODEL c⃝ WORKFLOW time s
- Page 157 and 158: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 159 and 160: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 161 and 162: 7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 163 and 164: 7.4. SUMMARY 7.4 Summary • I have
- Page 165 and 166: 8 Linking geomechanical modelling a
- Page 167 and 168: 8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Layer Thickn
- Page 169 and 170: 8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Unit E (GPa)
- Page 171 and 172: 8.3. RESULTS Marl Vugg 0.8 0.8 Norm
- Page 173 and 174: 8.3. RESULTS 15 10 Injector Produce
- Page 175 and 176: 8.3. RESULTS 2000 15 2000 15 1500 1
- Page 177 and 178: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 8.4 A softe
- Page 179 and 180: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 15 200
- Page 181 and 182: 8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 Max SW
- Page 183 and 184: 8.5. DISCUSSION pore-pressure being
- Page 185 and 186: 8.6. SUMMARY 8.6 Summary • I appl
- Page 187 and 188: 9 Conclusions Geological storage wi
- Page 189 and 190: calibrate. This model has been cali
- Page 191 and 192: 9.1. NOVEL CONTRIBUTIONS techniques
- Page 193 and 194: 9.2. FUTURE WORK Finally, the compa
- Page 195 and 196: Bibliography Abt, D. L., Fischer, K
- Page 197: BIBLIOGRAPHY Gassmann, F., 1951. Ub
- Page 201 and 202: BIBLIOGRAPHY Sayers, C. M., 2002. S
- Page 203 and 204: BIBLIOGRAPHY White, D., 2009. Monit
- Page 205 and 206: A List of Symbols The table below l
- Page 207 and 208: B In Support of Carbon Capture and
- Page 209 and 210: Both China and India are aggressive
- Page 211 and 212: Utsira rock properties vary signifi