Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 0.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
<strong>Microseismic</strong> activity is an observable manifestation <strong>of</strong> geomechanical deformation induced by<br />
injection. As the pore pressure is increased in a reservoir, effective compressive stress is reduced,<br />
causing it to exp<strong>and</strong>. I use a recently developed coupled fluid-flow/geomechanical modelling technique<br />
to model this injection-induced deformation. I develop a series <strong>of</strong> simple, representative models to<br />
study how the stress path induced by injection is modulated by the geometry <strong>of</strong> the reservoir <strong>and</strong> the<br />
material properties <strong>of</strong> both the reservoir <strong>and</strong> surrounding non-pay rocks. I find that small reservoirs<br />
that are s<strong>of</strong>ter than the surrounding rocks are most prone to stress arching effects, while flat extensive<br />
reservoirs that are stiffer than surrounding rocks tend to experience only the hydrostatic effective<br />
stress decrease induced by pore pressure increase. By computing the changes in deviatoric stress<br />
induced by injection, I am able to analyse which types <strong>of</strong> reservoir will be most prone to brittle failure<br />
(fracturing) <strong>and</strong> where this failure is most likely to occur. I find that small reservoirs are most prone<br />
to fracturing - in small s<strong>of</strong>t reservoirs the overburden is most likely to fracture above the injection<br />
well, in small stiff reservoirs fracturing is most likely to occur in the reservoir.<br />
Changes in the applied stress field will change the seismic properties <strong>of</strong> rocks in <strong>and</strong> around the<br />
reservoir. Therefore in theory it should be possible to image geomechanical deformation using seismic<br />
methods. To do so, a rock physics model is needed to map modelled stress changes into changes in<br />
seismic velocities. I have developed a model that uses a microstructural effective medium approach to<br />
map triaxial stress changes into anisotropic changes in P <strong>and</strong> S wave velocity. I have calibrated this<br />
model with over 200 sets <strong>of</strong> stress-dependent ultrasonic velocity data, measured on core samples, taken<br />
from the literature. I use this model to show that the differences in stress path caused by differing<br />
reservoir geometries <strong>and</strong> material properties may well generate resolvable variations in the 4-D seismic<br />
response <strong>of</strong> a CO 2 injection site. These responses have the potential to be used as a diagnostic in<br />
imaging geomechanical deformation, <strong>and</strong> thereby be used to contribute a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> CO 2 leakage due to fracturing.<br />
I have developed a workflow to construct geomechanical models, make seismic <strong>and</strong> microseismic<br />
predictions, <strong>and</strong> thereby to make comparisons with geophysical observations. In the final part <strong>of</strong><br />
this thesis I apply this workflow to the Weyburn field. I construct a representative geomechanical<br />
model to simulate production from the reservoir, followed by CO 2 injection for storage <strong>and</strong> EOR. The<br />
modelled rock mechanical properties are based on measurements made on core samples from Weyburn.<br />
I use the modelled stress changes to make microseismic <strong>and</strong> seismic anisotropy predictions, finding<br />
a poor match between predicted microseismic zones <strong>and</strong> where microseismicity has been observed at<br />
Weyburn, <strong>and</strong> a poor match between predicted <strong>and</strong> observed seismic anisotropy. However, I develop<br />
a second model that takes into account the s<strong>of</strong>tening effect that vugs <strong>and</strong> fractures will have on the<br />
stiffness <strong>of</strong> the reservoir that will not be included if core sample measurements are used without<br />
modification. This new model provides a much better match for both microseismicity <strong>and</strong> seismic<br />
anisotropy. The model indicates that microseismicity observed in the overburden at Weyburn does<br />
not represent fluid migration through the caprock but stress transfer through the rock frame. This<br />
approach shows how geophysical observations can be used to help calibrate <strong>and</strong> thereby improve the<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> a geomechanical model, providing a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the risks that geomechanical<br />
deformation can pose to the secure storage <strong>of</strong> CO 2 .<br />
VI