15.01.2015 Views

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 0.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>Microseismic</strong> activity is an observable manifestation <strong>of</strong> geomechanical deformation induced by<br />

injection. As the pore pressure is increased in a reservoir, effective compressive stress is reduced,<br />

causing it to exp<strong>and</strong>. I use a recently developed coupled fluid-flow/geomechanical modelling technique<br />

to model this injection-induced deformation. I develop a series <strong>of</strong> simple, representative models to<br />

study how the stress path induced by injection is modulated by the geometry <strong>of</strong> the reservoir <strong>and</strong> the<br />

material properties <strong>of</strong> both the reservoir <strong>and</strong> surrounding non-pay rocks. I find that small reservoirs<br />

that are s<strong>of</strong>ter than the surrounding rocks are most prone to stress arching effects, while flat extensive<br />

reservoirs that are stiffer than surrounding rocks tend to experience only the hydrostatic effective<br />

stress decrease induced by pore pressure increase. By computing the changes in deviatoric stress<br />

induced by injection, I am able to analyse which types <strong>of</strong> reservoir will be most prone to brittle failure<br />

(fracturing) <strong>and</strong> where this failure is most likely to occur. I find that small reservoirs are most prone<br />

to fracturing - in small s<strong>of</strong>t reservoirs the overburden is most likely to fracture above the injection<br />

well, in small stiff reservoirs fracturing is most likely to occur in the reservoir.<br />

Changes in the applied stress field will change the seismic properties <strong>of</strong> rocks in <strong>and</strong> around the<br />

reservoir. Therefore in theory it should be possible to image geomechanical deformation using seismic<br />

methods. To do so, a rock physics model is needed to map modelled stress changes into changes in<br />

seismic velocities. I have developed a model that uses a microstructural effective medium approach to<br />

map triaxial stress changes into anisotropic changes in P <strong>and</strong> S wave velocity. I have calibrated this<br />

model with over 200 sets <strong>of</strong> stress-dependent ultrasonic velocity data, measured on core samples, taken<br />

from the literature. I use this model to show that the differences in stress path caused by differing<br />

reservoir geometries <strong>and</strong> material properties may well generate resolvable variations in the 4-D seismic<br />

response <strong>of</strong> a CO 2 injection site. These responses have the potential to be used as a diagnostic in<br />

imaging geomechanical deformation, <strong>and</strong> thereby be used to contribute a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> CO 2 leakage due to fracturing.<br />

I have developed a workflow to construct geomechanical models, make seismic <strong>and</strong> microseismic<br />

predictions, <strong>and</strong> thereby to make comparisons with geophysical observations. In the final part <strong>of</strong><br />

this thesis I apply this workflow to the Weyburn field. I construct a representative geomechanical<br />

model to simulate production from the reservoir, followed by CO 2 injection for storage <strong>and</strong> EOR. The<br />

modelled rock mechanical properties are based on measurements made on core samples from Weyburn.<br />

I use the modelled stress changes to make microseismic <strong>and</strong> seismic anisotropy predictions, finding<br />

a poor match between predicted microseismic zones <strong>and</strong> where microseismicity has been observed at<br />

Weyburn, <strong>and</strong> a poor match between predicted <strong>and</strong> observed seismic anisotropy. However, I develop<br />

a second model that takes into account the s<strong>of</strong>tening effect that vugs <strong>and</strong> fractures will have on the<br />

stiffness <strong>of</strong> the reservoir that will not be included if core sample measurements are used without<br />

modification. This new model provides a much better match for both microseismicity <strong>and</strong> seismic<br />

anisotropy. The model indicates that microseismicity observed in the overburden at Weyburn does<br />

not represent fluid migration through the caprock but stress transfer through the rock frame. This<br />

approach shows how geophysical observations can be used to help calibrate <strong>and</strong> thereby improve the<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> a geomechanical model, providing a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the risks that geomechanical<br />

deformation can pose to the secure storage <strong>of</strong> CO 2 .<br />

VI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!