- Page 1:
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomech
- Page 5 and 6:
Abstract Capture of CO 2 produced a
- Page 7 and 8:
Author’s Declaration I declare th
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgments There are many thin
- Page 11 and 12: Table of Contents Abstract Author
- Page 13 and 14: TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.4 Results . . .
- Page 15 and 16: Preface ‘Research is not an end i
- Page 17 and 18: 6. D. Angus, J-M. Kendall, J.P. Ver
- Page 19 and 20: 1 Introduction A technology push ap
- Page 21 and 22: 1.2. CCS OVERVIEW Figure 1.2: CCS s
- Page 23 and 24: 1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW for CO 2 to be
- Page 25 and 26: 1.3. THESIS OVERVIEW as microseismi
- Page 27 and 28: 2 The Weyburn CO 2 injection projec
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING Fig
- Page 31 and 32: 2.2. WEYBURN GEOLOGICAL SETTING N F
- Page 33 and 34: 2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 35 and 36: 2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS 500
- Page 37 and 38: 2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Nor
- Page 39 and 40: 2.4. EVENT TIMING AND LOCATIONS Fig
- Page 41 and 42: 2.5. DISCUSSION 500 1000 1100 North
- Page 43 and 44: 2.6. SUMMARY 2.6 Summary • CO 2 s
- Page 45 and 46: 3 Inverting shear-wave splitting me
- Page 47 and 48: 3.2. INVERSION METHOD the additiona
- Page 49 and 50: 3.2. INVERSION METHOD 1. P-wave inc
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2. INVERSION METHOD 180 160 140 C
- Page 53 and 54: 3.2. INVERSION METHOD 2800 2800 260
- Page 55 and 56: 3.2. INVERSION METHOD Loop over γ,
- Page 57 and 58: 20 10 5 5 1 20 30 40 80 100 60 40 1
- Page 59: 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN th
- Page 63 and 64: 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN ξ
- Page 65 and 66: 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYBURN da
- Page 67 and 68: 4 2 2 3.4. SWS MEASUREMENTS AT WEYB
- Page 69 and 70: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.5. DISCUSSION
- Page 71 and 72: 3.6. SUMMARY 3.6 Summary • I have
- Page 73 and 74: 4 A comparison of microseismic moni
- Page 75 and 76: 4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 2400 Velocity
- Page 77 and 78: 4.2. EVENT LOCATIONS 200 150 Northi
- Page 79 and 80: 4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES Pressure (MPa
- Page 81 and 82: 4.3. EVENT MAGNITUDES 160 140 120 N
- Page 83 and 84: 4.4. SHEAR WAVE SPLITTING 50 −3 E
- Page 85 and 86: 4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION In
- Page 87 and 88: 4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION 6
- Page 89 and 90: 4.5. INITIAL S-WAVE POLARISATION of
- Page 91 and 92: 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAVE S
- Page 93 and 94: 1 1 5 5 30 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF S
- Page 95 and 96: 80 4.6. INTERPRETATION OF SHEAR WAV
- Page 97 and 98: 2 3 3.5 4 5 2 1.8 1.4 4 4.6. INTERP
- Page 99 and 100: 4.7. DISCUSSION 4.7 Discussion The
- Page 101 and 102: pressure, P fl σ ′ ij = σ ij
- Page 103 and 104: 5.2. EFFECTIVE STRESS AND STRESS PA
- Page 105 and 106: 5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING 5.3.1 Flui
- Page 107 and 108: 5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING MORE FLUID
- Page 109 and 110: 5.3. NUMERICAL MODELLING (a) (b) Fi
- Page 111 and 112:
5.4. RESULTS 0 500 1000 Depth (m) 1
- Page 113 and 114:
5.4. RESULTS 1 0.9 0.8 Soft Med Sti
- Page 115 and 116:
5.4. RESULTS Overburden Extension i
- Page 117 and 118:
5.4. RESULTS 1z:100x:100y 1z:100x:5
- Page 119 and 120:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT 1 0.9 0.8 Soft
- Page 121 and 122:
5.5. SURFACE UPLIFT Figure 5.17: Ma
- Page 123 and 124:
6 Generating anisotropic seismic mo
- Page 125 and 126:
6.2. STRESS-SENSITIVE ROCK PHYSICS
- Page 127 and 128:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 129 and 130:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 131 and 132:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 133 and 134:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 135 and 136:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 137 and 138:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 139 and 140:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 141 and 142:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 143 and 144:
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR N
- Page 145 and 146:
6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 147 and 148:
6.4. CALIBRATION WITH LITERATURE DA
- Page 149 and 150:
6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 151 and 152:
6.5. COMPARISON OF ROCK PHYSICS MOD
- Page 153 and 154:
7 Forward modelling of seismic prop
- Page 155 and 156:
7.2. SEISMODEL c⃝ WORKFLOW time s
- Page 157 and 158:
7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 159 and 160:
7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 161 and 162:
7.3. RESULTS FROM SIMPLE GEOMECHANI
- Page 163 and 164:
7.4. SUMMARY 7.4 Summary • I have
- Page 165 and 166:
8 Linking geomechanical modelling a
- Page 167 and 168:
8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Layer Thickn
- Page 169 and 170:
8.2. MODEL DESCRIPTION Unit E (GPa)
- Page 171 and 172:
8.3. RESULTS Marl Vugg 0.8 0.8 Norm
- Page 173 and 174:
8.3. RESULTS 15 10 Injector Produce
- Page 175 and 176:
8.3. RESULTS 2000 15 2000 15 1500 1
- Page 177 and 178:
8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 8.4 A softe
- Page 179 and 180:
8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 15 200
- Page 181 and 182:
8.4. A SOFTER RESERVOIR 2000 Max SW
- Page 183 and 184:
8.5. DISCUSSION pore-pressure being
- Page 185 and 186:
8.6. SUMMARY 8.6 Summary • I appl
- Page 187 and 188:
9 Conclusions Geological storage wi
- Page 189 and 190:
calibrate. This model has been cali
- Page 191 and 192:
9.1. NOVEL CONTRIBUTIONS techniques
- Page 193 and 194:
9.2. FUTURE WORK Finally, the compa
- Page 195 and 196:
Bibliography Abt, D. L., Fischer, K
- Page 197 and 198:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Gassmann, F., 1951. Ub
- Page 199 and 200:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Kendall, J.-M., Pilido
- Page 201 and 202:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Sayers, C. M., 2002. S
- Page 203 and 204:
BIBLIOGRAPHY White, D., 2009. Monit
- Page 205 and 206:
A List of Symbols The table below l
- Page 207 and 208:
B In Support of Carbon Capture and
- Page 209 and 210:
Both China and India are aggressive
- Page 211 and 212:
Utsira rock properties vary signifi