Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.2. SEISMODEL c⃝ WORKFLOW<br />
time step, is equal to C in . These are the stiffness <strong>of</strong> the background rock C r (which corresponds<br />
to the idealised case <strong>of</strong> the rock mass without any compliant porosity); <strong>and</strong> the initial crack density<br />
tensor ξi<br />
0 at zero stress. Hence I have two options for assigning suitable values for these parameters:<br />
to fix an initial C r <strong>and</strong> compute the ξi 0 tensor that produces a stiffness that matches Cin ; or to fix the<br />
ξ 0 i tensor, <strong>and</strong> compute the appropriate C r tensor that when combined with the assigned ξ 0 i tensor<br />
matches C in .<br />
Fixed C r<br />
To initialise using a fixed background stiffness, I must first assign this stiffness. This stiffness will be<br />
greater than C in , but less than that <strong>of</strong> the minerals making up the rock, as the effects <strong>of</strong> stiff, spherical<br />
pores must still be accounted for. In order to approximate this stiffness I use C in , <strong>and</strong> increase it by<br />
multiplying by (1 − Φ) −1 , such that<br />
C r =<br />
Cin<br />
1 − Φ . (7.1)<br />
Having approximated C r I compute ξi<br />
0 such that the computed stiffness matches C in at the initial<br />
timestep. In order to do this I first compute the requisite crack density at the initial stress conditions.<br />
This will be given by the difference in compliance between S r <strong>and</strong> S in , as by rearranging equation 6.7<br />
we have<br />
∆S = S in − S r . (7.2)<br />
In order to compute the unnormalised crack density terms I use the inversion procedure outlined in<br />
Chapter 6 to compute the crack density based on an observed stiffness <strong>and</strong> a background compliance<br />
using a Newton-Raphson approach, having first rotated both into a coordinate system defined by the<br />
principle stress directions. In this case the ‘observed stiffness’ is C in . The computed crack densities<br />
are then normalised using the h i parameter given in equation 6.13. Having computed the normalised<br />
crack density at the initial stress conditions, I rearrange equation 6.37, so that the crack density at<br />
zero stress, ξ 0 i , is given by ξ 0 i =<br />
ξ(σ i )<br />
exp (−c r σ i ) . (7.3)<br />
The initial crack density tensor is then rotated back into global (ENZ) coordinates to be used in<br />
predicting stress dependent stiffnesses at future timesteps.<br />
Fixed ξ 0 i<br />
To initialise using a fixed initial crack density, I must compute the crack density at the initial stress<br />
conditions, <strong>and</strong> then remove this additional compliance from S in to give S r . The unnormalised crack<br />
density at the initial stress conditions is given by<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
0 0<br />
ξ1 0 exp(−c r σ 1 )/h 1 0 0<br />
α = ⎜<br />
⎝ 0 ξ2 0 exp(−c r σ 2 )/h 2 0 ⎟<br />
⎠ , (7.4)<br />
assuming that the initial crack density tensor has been rotated into the coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the<br />
initial principle stress directions.<br />
The second <strong>and</strong> fourth order crack density tensors are used to<br />
137