15.01.2015 Views

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.2. SEISMODEL c⃝ WORKFLOW<br />

time step, is equal to C in . These are the stiffness <strong>of</strong> the background rock C r (which corresponds<br />

to the idealised case <strong>of</strong> the rock mass without any compliant porosity); <strong>and</strong> the initial crack density<br />

tensor ξi<br />

0 at zero stress. Hence I have two options for assigning suitable values for these parameters:<br />

to fix an initial C r <strong>and</strong> compute the ξi 0 tensor that produces a stiffness that matches Cin ; or to fix the<br />

ξ 0 i tensor, <strong>and</strong> compute the appropriate C r tensor that when combined with the assigned ξ 0 i tensor<br />

matches C in .<br />

Fixed C r<br />

To initialise using a fixed background stiffness, I must first assign this stiffness. This stiffness will be<br />

greater than C in , but less than that <strong>of</strong> the minerals making up the rock, as the effects <strong>of</strong> stiff, spherical<br />

pores must still be accounted for. In order to approximate this stiffness I use C in , <strong>and</strong> increase it by<br />

multiplying by (1 − Φ) −1 , such that<br />

C r =<br />

Cin<br />

1 − Φ . (7.1)<br />

Having approximated C r I compute ξi<br />

0 such that the computed stiffness matches C in at the initial<br />

timestep. In order to do this I first compute the requisite crack density at the initial stress conditions.<br />

This will be given by the difference in compliance between S r <strong>and</strong> S in , as by rearranging equation 6.7<br />

we have<br />

∆S = S in − S r . (7.2)<br />

In order to compute the unnormalised crack density terms I use the inversion procedure outlined in<br />

Chapter 6 to compute the crack density based on an observed stiffness <strong>and</strong> a background compliance<br />

using a Newton-Raphson approach, having first rotated both into a coordinate system defined by the<br />

principle stress directions. In this case the ‘observed stiffness’ is C in . The computed crack densities<br />

are then normalised using the h i parameter given in equation 6.13. Having computed the normalised<br />

crack density at the initial stress conditions, I rearrange equation 6.37, so that the crack density at<br />

zero stress, ξ 0 i , is given by ξ 0 i =<br />

ξ(σ i )<br />

exp (−c r σ i ) . (7.3)<br />

The initial crack density tensor is then rotated back into global (ENZ) coordinates to be used in<br />

predicting stress dependent stiffnesses at future timesteps.<br />

Fixed ξ 0 i<br />

To initialise using a fixed initial crack density, I must compute the crack density at the initial stress<br />

conditions, <strong>and</strong> then remove this additional compliance from S in to give S r . The unnormalised crack<br />

density at the initial stress conditions is given by<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

0 0<br />

ξ1 0 exp(−c r σ 1 )/h 1 0 0<br />

α = ⎜<br />

⎝ 0 ξ2 0 exp(−c r σ 2 )/h 2 0 ⎟<br />

⎠ , (7.4)<br />

assuming that the initial crack density tensor has been rotated into the coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the<br />

initial principle stress directions.<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> fourth order crack density tensors are used to<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!