15.01.2015 Views

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6.<br />

GENERATING ANISOTROPIC SEISMIC MODELS BASED ON GEOMECHANICAL SIMULATION<br />

essence means that, although a rock might be initially anisotropic, the change in velocity caused by<br />

a particular stress change will be the same regardless <strong>of</strong> the axis along which this stress is applied.<br />

The ability to deal with intrinsic <strong>and</strong> stress induced anisotropy represents a significant advantage<br />

for the Prioul et al. (2004) model. However, as with all <strong>of</strong> the models discussed above, the observed<br />

nonlinear stress-velocity relationship is fitted with a linear trend. Prioul et al. (2004) get around<br />

this issue by fitting low <strong>and</strong> high stress regions separately, an approach that significantly limits the<br />

general applicability <strong>of</strong> the model. Furthermore, the model can only be parameterised with triaxial<br />

stress velocity measurements. Such experiments are much less common in the literature, so the kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> extensive calibration that I was able to perform for the micro-structural approach is not as easily<br />

performed. Given that the Prioul et al. (2004) model is already less intuitive to grasp, the difficulties<br />

in parameterisation mean that this approach does not provide such an intuitive framework within<br />

which underst<strong>and</strong> how seismic velocities respond to changes in applied stress.<br />

The model I have outlined in this chapter attempts to describe the micro-structural response to<br />

stress changes, using this as a route to describe seismic properties via an effective medium model.<br />

Real rocks do not contain the idealised, penny-shaped discontinuities that I use as the framework for<br />

my modelling. However, it has long been recognised (e.g., Hudson, 1981; Sayers <strong>and</strong> Kachanov, 1995;<br />

Schoenberg <strong>and</strong> Sayers, 1995; Thomsen, 1995; Hall et al., 2008) that the response <strong>of</strong> compliant grain<br />

boundary discontinuities to the infinitesimal strain, high strain rate deformation induced by a seismic<br />

wave can be approximated very closely using such an approach. The additional step that I have made<br />

is to assume that the compliant grain boundary discontinuities respond in the same manner to the<br />

finite strain, low strain rate deformation induced by geomechanical stress changes as they do to the<br />

deformation during the passage <strong>of</strong> a seismic wave. This is a reasonable assumption to make so long<br />

as geomechanical deformation remains elastic. The second assumption that I make is that the size<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> the grain boundary discontinuities can be modelled with an exponential distribution.<br />

This assumption is somewhat more arbitrary in its nature, as there is no physical reason why a power<br />

law distribution could not be used instead. However, the exponential distribution provides a good<br />

match to velocity observations, <strong>and</strong> is easily parameterised.<br />

The advantage gained by describing stress sensitive velocities using a micro-structural model is that<br />

we can move closer to underst<strong>and</strong>ing the physics behind the phenomenon. By doing so, it is possible<br />

to develop a more intuitive underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the processes involved. The model I have developed is<br />

far more intuitive in its use than the third-order elasticity approach. For instance it is not intuitive to<br />

say how increased core damage will affect the three independent terms <strong>of</strong> Prioul’s isotropic third order<br />

tensor. Furthermore, given the need to limit the third-order tensor to isotropy, this model cannot<br />

account for anisotropic rock fabrics as seen in many clay <strong>and</strong>/or mica rich rocks.<br />

In contrast, for the micro-structural model it is intuitive to conceive that damage will increase<br />

the initial microcrack density terms, while alignment <strong>of</strong> platy minerals will increase the crack density<br />

along one axis <strong>of</strong> symmetry alone. Additionally, the improved underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the physical processes<br />

that a micro-structural analysis provides leads to a model that can account for observed phenomena<br />

such as intrinsic <strong>and</strong> stress-induced anisotropy, <strong>and</strong> the nonlinear response <strong>of</strong> velocities to stress<br />

(the micro-structural model has no need to fit separate linear portions <strong>of</strong> the stress-velocity curve).<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!