Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.3. A MICRO-STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR NONLINEAR ELASTICITY<br />
<strong>and</strong> α mm is the trace <strong>of</strong> α (α mm = α 11 + α 22 + α 33 ). By rearranging equations 6.18 <strong>and</strong> 6.19 I can<br />
rewrite β in terms <strong>of</strong> α <strong>and</strong> the ratio B N /B T , such that<br />
β 1111 = 1 ( )<br />
BN<br />
− 1 α mm . (6.20)<br />
3 B T<br />
Substitution <strong>of</strong> this relationship into equations 6.11 <strong>and</strong> 6.12 yields the overall stiffness as a function<br />
<strong>of</strong> both the second <strong>and</strong> fourth order crack density tensors, by way <strong>of</strong> the ratio B N /B T ,<br />
[<br />
] ⎫<br />
C ii = (Sjk r + f 9 αm ) 2 − (Sjj r + α jj + f 3 αm )(Skk r + α kk + f 3 αm ) /D ⎬<br />
[<br />
]<br />
C ij = (Sij r + f 9 αm )(Skk r + α kk + f 3 αm ) − (Sik r + f 9 αm )(Sjk r + f 9 αm ) /D ⎭ i ≠ j ≠ k ≤ 3<br />
C ii = (S r ii + α jj + α kk + 4f 9 αm ) −1 i ≠ j ≠ k ≥ 4 (6.21)<br />
where<br />
D = (S r 11 + α 11 + f 3 αm )(S r 23 + f 9 αm ) 2 + (S r 22 + α 22 + f 3 αm )(S r 13 + f 9 αm ) 2<br />
+(S r 33 + α 33 + f 3 αm )(S r 12 + f 9 αm ) 2<br />
−2(S r 12 + f 9 αm )(S r 13 + f 9 αm )(S r 23 + f 9 αm )<br />
−(S r 11 + α 11 + f 3 αm )(S r 22 + α 22 + f 3 αm )(S r 33 + α 33 + f 3 αm ) , (6.22)<br />
f =<br />
( )<br />
BN<br />
− 1 . (6.23)<br />
B T<br />
Having defined a set <strong>of</strong> equations for the overall stiffness with the fourth order crack density tensor<br />
written in terms <strong>of</strong> the second order crack density tensor <strong>and</strong> B N /B T<br />
ratio, the inversion for crack<br />
density <strong>and</strong> B N /B T can then be performed using an iterative Newton-Raphson approach with model<br />
update:<br />
The vector model misfit is evaluated<br />
δb l = C obs<br />
l<br />
where the matrix Jacobian<br />
is inverted to evaluate the vector model update<br />
α ii = α ii + δm i , i = 1, 3. (6.24)<br />
− C model<br />
l l = 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 12, 13, 23 , (6.25)<br />
J il = ∂Cmodel l<br />
(6.26)<br />
∂α i<br />
δm i = J −1<br />
il<br />
δb l . (6.27)<br />
The matrix Jacobian <strong>of</strong> derivatives with respect to the second order crack density tensor α ii is<br />
evaluated using the following set <strong>of</strong> equations below. The partial derivatives <strong>of</strong> the denominator term<br />
113