Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Microseismic Monitoring and Geomechanical Modelling of CO2 - bris
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.2. STRESS-SENSITIVE ROCK PHYSICS MODELS<br />
Figure 6.1: Using 3rd order elasticity to model the nonlinear elasticity <strong>of</strong> a North Sea shale. Two<br />
linear fits are given, for the low stress region (30MPa). From<br />
Prioul et al. (2004).<br />
Pressure (MPa) C 111 ± ∆C 111 (GPa) C 112 ± ∆C 112 (GPa) C 123 ± ∆C 123 (GPa)<br />
5-30 -11300 ± 2900 -4800 ± 2500 5800 ± 4000<br />
30-100 -3100 ± 600 -800 ± 500 40 ± 800<br />
Table 6.1: Third-order terms used by Prioul et al. (2004) to empirically approximate the nonlinear<br />
elastic behaviour <strong>of</strong> a North Sea shale.<br />
defined by the three independent non-linear coefficients C 111 , C 112 <strong>and</strong> C 123 that describe the isotropic<br />
3rd-order tensor.<br />
The 3rd-order terms are determined empirically from lab ultrasonic measurements on core samples<br />
by minimising a least-squares misfit function between observed measurements <strong>and</strong> model predictions<br />
(see Prioul et al., 2004, for details). Equation (6.2) still requires a linear fit to the non-linear<br />
stress/stiffness curve, so linear fits are determined for high stress <strong>and</strong> low stress regions (see Figure<br />
6.1). The values <strong>of</strong> the third-order terms for the North Sea shale shown in Figure 6.1 are given in<br />
Table 6.1.<br />
The need to fit high <strong>and</strong> low pressure regions separately stems from trying to fit the nonlinear<br />
relationship between stress <strong>and</strong> velocity with a linear regression. The choice <strong>of</strong> where to assign the<br />
high <strong>and</strong> low pressure zones is somewhat arbitrary. Indeed, there is no conceptual reason why multiple<br />
regions could not be defined (i.e., high, medium <strong>and</strong> low stress regions). It has been suggested that<br />
the low pressure region, where velocities are more sensitive to stress, corresponds to stresses below<br />
the in situ stress from which the core was taken (e.g., Holt et al., 2000). As the core is extracted, the<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> these stresses damages the core, creating microcracks <strong>and</strong> increasing the stress sensitivity.<br />
When the core is re-stressed to in situ conditions in lab experiments, the microcracks are closed, <strong>and</strong><br />
so the stress sensitivity is lowered. However, it is very difficult to test this assertion empirically.<br />
107