Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT A<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
The majority of the problems found in this study may be classified into three major<br />
categories:<br />
− Problems associated with detection of and inspection for ice during pre-flight<br />
inspections;<br />
− Problems with ice removal, or the confirmation of successful ice removal after de-icing;<br />
and<br />
− Difficulties in confirming that aircraft critical surfaces were free from frozen<br />
contamination before takeoff.<br />
The procedural problems observed in 25% of reports included:<br />
− failure of de-icing crews to follow prescribed procedures,<br />
− inadequately designed procedures for de-icing and/or post de-icing checks,<br />
− poor communication between de-icing crews and flight crews,<br />
− improperly prepared de-icing fluids,<br />
− lack of reliable equipment, and<br />
− inadequate staffing levels to conduct de-icing.<br />
Inspections: 25% of the problems noted were the result of difficulties in detecting ice on<br />
aircraft wings during pre-flight. Half of these cited the elevated height of wing and tail<br />
surfaces as a major factor in ice inspection/detection difficulties. 11% cited ice detection<br />
problems such as crews being unable to see ice due to poor lighting conditions, the<br />
transparent nature of clear ice, or ice that was otherwise hidden from view. Not being able to<br />
reach ice during a tactile wing inspection was also cited. Schedule (time) pressures were<br />
also reported as contributing to inadequate inspections.<br />
Ice Removal: 50% of reports mentioned problems with ice removal and/or verification of ice<br />
removal. 25% cited problems of ice remaining on aircraft critical surfaces after de-icing was<br />
completed. In 12 cases where de-icing was ineffective at removing all the contamination the<br />
flight crew relied on the de-icing crew's statement or hand signals that de-icing had been<br />
completed, and therefore, failed to verify ice removal for themselves.<br />
Before Takeoff: A quarter of the reports in this study referenced problems with the captain<br />
making the determination of a “clean wing”. In the absence of an external pre-take-off<br />
contamination check by ground crew, pilots found checking the wings from the cockpit and<br />
cabin impossible to accomplish, in many cases due to anti-icing fluid obscuring the view<br />
airsight GmbH - 5 -