17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT A<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

The majority of the problems found in this study may be classified into three major<br />

categories:<br />

− Problems associated with detection of and inspection for ice during pre-flight<br />

inspections;<br />

− Problems with ice removal, or the confirmation of successful ice removal after de-icing;<br />

and<br />

− Difficulties in confirming that aircraft critical surfaces were free from frozen<br />

contamination before takeoff.<br />

The procedural problems observed in 25% of reports included:<br />

− failure of de-icing crews to follow prescribed procedures,<br />

− inadequately designed procedures for de-icing and/or post de-icing checks,<br />

− poor communication between de-icing crews and flight crews,<br />

− improperly prepared de-icing fluids,<br />

− lack of reliable equipment, and<br />

− inadequate staffing levels to conduct de-icing.<br />

Inspections: 25% of the problems noted were the result of difficulties in detecting ice on<br />

aircraft wings during pre-flight. Half of these cited the elevated height of wing and tail<br />

surfaces as a major factor in ice inspection/detection difficulties. 11% cited ice detection<br />

problems such as crews being unable to see ice due to poor lighting conditions, the<br />

transparent nature of clear ice, or ice that was otherwise hidden from view. Not being able to<br />

reach ice during a tactile wing inspection was also cited. Schedule (time) pressures were<br />

also reported as contributing to inadequate inspections.<br />

Ice Removal: 50% of reports mentioned problems with ice removal and/or verification of ice<br />

removal. 25% cited problems of ice remaining on aircraft critical surfaces after de-icing was<br />

completed. In 12 cases where de-icing was ineffective at removing all the contamination the<br />

flight crew relied on the de-icing crew's statement or hand signals that de-icing had been<br />

completed, and therefore, failed to verify ice removal for themselves.<br />

Before Takeoff: A quarter of the reports in this study referenced problems with the captain<br />

making the determination of a “clean wing”. In the absence of an external pre-take-off<br />

contamination check by ground crew, pilots found checking the wings from the cockpit and<br />

cabin impossible to accomplish, in many cases due to anti-icing fluid obscuring the view<br />

airsight GmbH - 5 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!