Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
The thrust behind all ICAO SARPs for SMS is clear: that it is the responsibility of all<br />
organisations across the aviation industry to identify hazards in all areas of operation,<br />
assess them for risk and take mitigating actions where necessary. That this should<br />
include the hazards encountered by de-icing / anti-icing operatives is unquestioned.<br />
The fact that such data is not being collected, analysed and/or shared is evident from<br />
our Study.<br />
There are several options available to ensure an improved situation in these respects, and<br />
they are detailed below.<br />
SAF1. Conduct an Industry-wide collaborative safety initiative: including data<br />
collection and analysis; awareness activities; and development of<br />
recommendations and, where possible, tools. Recommended.<br />
An Industry-wide Safety Initiative, involving all stakeholder groups including<br />
service providers, and having the primary aim of obtaining good quality safety<br />
data concerning de-icing / anti-icing operations. To achieve this, service<br />
providers would require support and guidance to establish effective reporting<br />
cultures. Such a Safety Initiative could be launched and facilitated in many<br />
ways, including by:<br />
SAF1.a. <strong>EASA</strong> alone.<br />
SAF1.b. <strong>EASA</strong> in partnership with Industry; perhaps through the ESSI.<br />
SAF1.c. <strong>EASA</strong> in conjunction with Member State NAAs.<br />
SAF1.d. Industry alone; perhaps through FSF, IATA, the airline<br />
Associations etc.<br />
SAF2. Reinterpret existing regulations for operators and aerodromes to motivate<br />
greater collection and analysis of relevant safety data. Recommended.<br />
Existing Rules for operators and aerodromes could be re-interpreted to ensure<br />
that the relevant safety data is collected. This would require <strong>EASA</strong> and NAA<br />
collaboration and cooperation. As no amendments to regulations would be<br />
required under this option, a great deal of explanatory material would be<br />
necessary. The appropriate Regulatory mechanisms include those listed<br />
above for SMS and Occurrence <strong>Report</strong>ing. Such reinterpretation may best be<br />
served by the use of AMC and GM produced by NAAs.<br />
SAF3. Amend proposed <strong>EASA</strong> regulations for authorities and operators to ensure<br />
effective collection and analysis of relevant safety data.<br />
airsight GmbH 24