17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

The thrust behind all ICAO SARPs for SMS is clear: that it is the responsibility of all<br />

organisations across the aviation industry to identify hazards in all areas of operation,<br />

assess them for risk and take mitigating actions where necessary. That this should<br />

include the hazards encountered by de-icing / anti-icing operatives is unquestioned.<br />

The fact that such data is not being collected, analysed and/or shared is evident from<br />

our Study.<br />

There are several options available to ensure an improved situation in these respects, and<br />

they are detailed below.<br />

SAF1. Conduct an Industry-wide collaborative safety initiative: including data<br />

collection and analysis; awareness activities; and development of<br />

recommendations and, where possible, tools. Recommended.<br />

An Industry-wide Safety Initiative, involving all stakeholder groups including<br />

service providers, and having the primary aim of obtaining good quality safety<br />

data concerning de-icing / anti-icing operations. To achieve this, service<br />

providers would require support and guidance to establish effective reporting<br />

cultures. Such a Safety Initiative could be launched and facilitated in many<br />

ways, including by:<br />

SAF1.a. <strong>EASA</strong> alone.<br />

SAF1.b. <strong>EASA</strong> in partnership with Industry; perhaps through the ESSI.<br />

SAF1.c. <strong>EASA</strong> in conjunction with Member State NAAs.<br />

SAF1.d. Industry alone; perhaps through FSF, IATA, the airline<br />

Associations etc.<br />

SAF2. Reinterpret existing regulations for operators and aerodromes to motivate<br />

greater collection and analysis of relevant safety data. Recommended.<br />

Existing Rules for operators and aerodromes could be re-interpreted to ensure<br />

that the relevant safety data is collected. This would require <strong>EASA</strong> and NAA<br />

collaboration and cooperation. As no amendments to regulations would be<br />

required under this option, a great deal of explanatory material would be<br />

necessary. The appropriate Regulatory mechanisms include those listed<br />

above for SMS and Occurrence <strong>Report</strong>ing. Such reinterpretation may best be<br />

served by the use of AMC and GM produced by NAAs.<br />

SAF3. Amend proposed <strong>EASA</strong> regulations for authorities and operators to ensure<br />

effective collection and analysis of relevant safety data.<br />

airsight GmbH 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!