17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

standard performance and their implications for the management system, and rectify<br />

situations involving below standard performance identified through safety assurance<br />

activities. The changes should be tracked to ensure that they are effective.<br />

b. Continuous improvement should be achieved through proactive evaluation of:<br />

i. facilities, equipment, documentation and procedures through safety audits<br />

and surveys;<br />

ii. Individual performance to verify the fulfilment of their safety responsibilities;<br />

and<br />

iii. reactive evaluations in order to verify the effectiveness of the system for<br />

control and mitigation of risk.<br />

Introduces ICAO SMS SARPS.<br />

1.a Highlights the need to ensure operators are encouraging and providing the means for<br />

service providers to collect and supply safety data concerning human factors, and<br />

organisational factors within their own organisation. Linking this to the operator’s de-icing /<br />

anti-icing policy/programme will highlight the need.<br />

2.b A nominated post-holder may be the person responsible to make the decision to either<br />

take mitigating measures or not, however, they will need to consult an expert on the subject<br />

of de-icing / anti-icing. The safety manager may not be suitably qualified or experienced, and<br />

therefore requiring the operator to nominate a subject-matter-expert will resolve this.<br />

3.a Human slips, errors and deviations made by service provider personnel are not required<br />

to be reported, let alone investigated. Mandatory occurrence reporting schemes tend to<br />

control the focus of some operators; however, under the auspices of a performance-driven<br />

regulation, such as SMS, the requirement to go beyond MORs is clear.<br />

4.a Encouraging operators to include safety objectives within their de-icing / anti-icing policy<br />

should drive the need to collect data in order to measure performance. Such performance<br />

initially may revolve around increasing reports from service providers from zero in some<br />

cases to what they would be expected to be. (Quote Kevan Baines of Baines-Simmons:<br />

when speaking about maintenance organisations at an IFA conference 22 Sep at Gatwick,<br />

he said “they should be receiving on average 2 human factors reports per person per year,<br />

because that’s what airlines get from their pilots”. This need may be met through AMC to<br />

OR.GEN.205 Contracting and Purchasing, shown below.<br />

5.a Highlights the need to assess new providers for safety performance before, or when new<br />

airsight GmbH - 38 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!