Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
standard performance and their implications for the management system, and rectify<br />
situations involving below standard performance identified through safety assurance<br />
activities. The changes should be tracked to ensure that they are effective.<br />
b. Continuous improvement should be achieved through proactive evaluation of:<br />
i. facilities, equipment, documentation and procedures through safety audits<br />
and surveys;<br />
ii. Individual performance to verify the fulfilment of their safety responsibilities;<br />
and<br />
iii. reactive evaluations in order to verify the effectiveness of the system for<br />
control and mitigation of risk.<br />
Introduces ICAO SMS SARPS.<br />
1.a Highlights the need to ensure operators are encouraging and providing the means for<br />
service providers to collect and supply safety data concerning human factors, and<br />
organisational factors within their own organisation. Linking this to the operator’s de-icing /<br />
anti-icing policy/programme will highlight the need.<br />
2.b A nominated post-holder may be the person responsible to make the decision to either<br />
take mitigating measures or not, however, they will need to consult an expert on the subject<br />
of de-icing / anti-icing. The safety manager may not be suitably qualified or experienced, and<br />
therefore requiring the operator to nominate a subject-matter-expert will resolve this.<br />
3.a Human slips, errors and deviations made by service provider personnel are not required<br />
to be reported, let alone investigated. Mandatory occurrence reporting schemes tend to<br />
control the focus of some operators; however, under the auspices of a performance-driven<br />
regulation, such as SMS, the requirement to go beyond MORs is clear.<br />
4.a Encouraging operators to include safety objectives within their de-icing / anti-icing policy<br />
should drive the need to collect data in order to measure performance. Such performance<br />
initially may revolve around increasing reports from service providers from zero in some<br />
cases to what they would be expected to be. (Quote Kevan Baines of Baines-Simmons:<br />
when speaking about maintenance organisations at an IFA conference 22 Sep at Gatwick,<br />
he said “they should be receiving on average 2 human factors reports per person per year,<br />
because that’s what airlines get from their pilots”. This need may be met through AMC to<br />
OR.GEN.205 Contracting and Purchasing, shown below.<br />
5.a Highlights the need to assess new providers for safety performance before, or when new<br />
airsight GmbH - 38 -