17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERIM REPORT – DATA SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

2.1.5 Impact on affected traffic of Type I Fluids unavailability<br />

The Figure 6 displays a qualitative “risk factor”, based on the total number of affected aircraft<br />

traffic at aerodromes not providing Type I fluids and the weather zone (number of<br />

movements of affected traffic at aerodromes not providing type I – multiplied by the weather<br />

zone number, e.g. 1 for “Zone 1”). However, a different weighting of the parameters may<br />

have led to slightly different results, according to this key indicator; the most affected<br />

countries by potential safety issues related to the non-availability of Type I fluids are United<br />

Kingdom, Poland, Italy, Austria, Germany and Romania.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Poland<br />

Italy<br />

Aus tria<br />

Germany<br />

Romania<br />

Bulgaria<br />

Ireland<br />

The Netherlands<br />

France<br />

Spain<br />

Greece<br />

Luxemburg<br />

Norway<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Iceland<br />

airsight GmbH - 8 -<br />

Risk factor based on total affected traffic<br />

Figure 6: Impact on affected traffic of Type I Fluids unavailability (based on number of<br />

affected traffic movements at aerodromes not providing Type I fluids and number of<br />

snow days)<br />

The Figure 7 displays a similar qualitative “risk factor” as the previous one, but based only on<br />

the number of aerodromes not providing Type I fluids and the number of snow days. In this<br />

case, the risk factor does not take the traffic volumes into account.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!