Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
can/cannot be used, via the aircraft manufacturer. It is currently normal that manufacturers<br />
indicate that airworthiness is compromised by contamination (eg ice, snow, slush etc) on<br />
aircraft surfaces, and it should already be made clear in the AFM whether certain amounts of<br />
certain contamination (eg frost) on certain surfaces is acceptable and in compliance with the<br />
CoA.<br />
No options or need to change this rule.<br />
<strong>EASA</strong> has already taken action by requesting specific information from Type Certificate<br />
Holders [14 April 2009 PBL/ein/C(1.1) 2009(D)61465] concerning any recommended<br />
procedures and limitations for each aircraft type. Aircraft manufacturers have already issued<br />
Operational Notices concerning maintenance procedures for preventing and managing fluid<br />
residues.<br />
OPS 1.035<br />
Quality system<br />
(a) An operator shall establish one quality system and designate one quality manager to<br />
monitor compliance with, and adequacy of, procedures required to ensure safe operational<br />
practices and airworthy aeroplanes. Compliance monitoring must include a feed-back<br />
system to the accountable manager (see also OPS 1.175 (h)) to ensure corrective action as<br />
necessary.<br />
(b) The quality system must include a quality assurance programme that contains<br />
procedures designed to verify that all operations are being conducted in accordance with all<br />
applicable requirements, standards and procedures.<br />
It is through this Rule that airlines are obliged to ensure that their own procedures are<br />
adequate to ensure airworthy aeroplanes. Furthermore, as well as meeting regulatory<br />
requirements, the airline must verify that all operations are being conducted in accordance<br />
with all applicable standards and procedures. There is no definition or explanation of what<br />
these standards and procedures may include. EU OPS has no supporting material, and no<br />
mention is made to contracted-out services. Whereas JAR OPS 1, Section 2 used to provide<br />
interpretive information (some excerpts below) especially AMC OPS 1.035. 5.1 dealing<br />
directly with sub-contractors:<br />
JAA AMC OPS 1.035<br />
2.3 Purpose of the Quality System<br />
airsight GmbH - 6 -