Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B EASA.2009.OP.21 EASA NPA 2008 – 22c Under Review following CRD Implementing Rules for Air Operations of Community Operators - Draft Opinion and Decision Organisation Requirements (General) Applicability: One of six NPAs issued on “Authority and Organisation Requirements” containing draft Opinion on the Implementing Rules for Authorities, draft Opinion on the Implementing Rules for Organisations and the related draft Decisions. This NPA specifically contains requirements for establishing management systems and performance-based methods of operation. Options: For all elements of this NPA 2008 – 22, there may be time and motivation to include, in the first publication, amendments related to improving the standard of de-icing / anti-icing, through operators’ procedures and programmes, and also through the requirements for Authorities. Otherwise, amendments can be proposed after publication of the Implementing Rules for Operations and Authority Requirements. Impact: Any changes to these proposed regulations and associated supporting material will be immediately applicable on publication of the rules (pending any legal or practical periods allowed for adjustment). AMC 2 to OR.GEN.200(a)(2) Management System SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT OTHER ORGANISATIONS 1. Hazard identification processes. a. Proactive hazard identification processes should be the formal means of collecting, recording, analysing, acting on and generating feedback about hazards and the associated risks that affect the safety of the operational activities of the organisation. b. Hazards, events or safety concerns should be assessed, analysed, reported, the data collected and stored. c. Information provided by analysis should be distributed. d. Confidential reporting systems should be based on established human factors airsight GmbH - 36 -
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B EASA.2009.OP.21 principles including an effective feedback process. 2. Risk assessment and mitigation processes. a. A formal risk management process should be developed and maintained that ensures analysis (in terms of probability and severity of occurrence), assessment (in terms of tolerability) and control (in terms of mitigation) of risks to an acceptable level. b. The levels of management who have the authority to make decisions regarding safety risks tolerability should be specified. 3. Internal safety investigation. a. The scope of internal safety investigations should include occurrences that are not required to be investigated or reported to the competent authority. 4. Safety performance monitoring and measurement. a. Safety performance monitoring and measurement should be the process by which the safety performance of the organisation is verified in comparison to the safety policies and objectives. b. This process should include: i. safety reporting; ii. safety studies; iii. safety reviews including trends reviews; iv. safety audits; and v. surveys. c. The process should be proportional to the size of the organisation and complexity of the activities and be compatible with other management systems and processes used by the organisation. 5. The management of change. a. The management of change should be a formal process that identifies external and internal change that may affect the activities of the organisation. It utilises the organisation’s existing hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation processes to ensure that there is no adverse effect on safety. 6. Continuous improvement of the safety system. a. Continuous improvement should determine the immediate causes of below airsight GmbH - 37 -
Page 1 and 2:
Research Project EASA.2009/4 Regula
Page 3 and 4:
EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
Page 5 and 6:
INTERIM REPORT - INTRODUCTION EASA.
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
INTERIM REPORT - DATA SUMMARY AND A
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 149 and 150: EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
Page 197: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
show all

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?