17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

explanation, or guidance material.<br />

The impact would be clearer instructions for NAAs to take some notice of how effective<br />

operators are at influencing the standards set by service providers.<br />

AMC 3 AR.GEN.305 Monitoring of activities OPS<br />

1. The competent authority should establish a schedule of inspections appropriate to each<br />

operator's business. The planning of inspections should take into account the results of the<br />

hazard identification and risk assessment conducted and maintained by the operator as part<br />

of the operator’s management system. Inspectors should work in accordance with the<br />

schedule provided to them.<br />

Assuming that the operator’s SMS is effective and suitably resourced, this AMC could be<br />

effective. However, unless NAAs are specifically looking to learn whether operators are<br />

collecting adequate safety data from service providers with which to effectively identify all<br />

hazards, the effects of this AMC will be less than desired. Similarly, to limit (in this respect)<br />

inspections to only cover the results of an operator’s hazard identification and risk<br />

assessment system, deters the NAA scope to inspections in response to valid safety data<br />

attained from elsewhere.<br />

It may help to define clearly that inspections programmes ought to take account of any<br />

relevant safety data regardless of source (eg FAA, FSF, ERA, other operators etc). A<br />

dedicated safety initiative would help to inform NAAs of the hazards that exist in the Industry.<br />

This would have the effect of NAAs helping to cross-fertilise best-practices across operators.<br />

AMC to AR.OPS.300 Certification procedure OPS<br />

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL OF CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS<br />

The competent authority should verify that:<br />

1. the applicant is in compliance with the applicable requirements and recognized standards;<br />

2. the procedures specified in the procedures manual are sufficient for the safe transport of<br />

dangerous goods;<br />

3. operations personnel is properly trained; and<br />

4. a reporting scheme is in place.<br />

This is shown as an example, if de-icing / anti-icing was ever considered as requiring special<br />

airsight GmbH - 54 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!