Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
explanation, or guidance material.<br />
The impact would be clearer instructions for NAAs to take some notice of how effective<br />
operators are at influencing the standards set by service providers.<br />
AMC 3 AR.GEN.305 Monitoring of activities OPS<br />
1. The competent authority should establish a schedule of inspections appropriate to each<br />
operator's business. The planning of inspections should take into account the results of the<br />
hazard identification and risk assessment conducted and maintained by the operator as part<br />
of the operator’s management system. Inspectors should work in accordance with the<br />
schedule provided to them.<br />
Assuming that the operator’s SMS is effective and suitably resourced, this AMC could be<br />
effective. However, unless NAAs are specifically looking to learn whether operators are<br />
collecting adequate safety data from service providers with which to effectively identify all<br />
hazards, the effects of this AMC will be less than desired. Similarly, to limit (in this respect)<br />
inspections to only cover the results of an operator’s hazard identification and risk<br />
assessment system, deters the NAA scope to inspections in response to valid safety data<br />
attained from elsewhere.<br />
It may help to define clearly that inspections programmes ought to take account of any<br />
relevant safety data regardless of source (eg FAA, FSF, ERA, other operators etc). A<br />
dedicated safety initiative would help to inform NAAs of the hazards that exist in the Industry.<br />
This would have the effect of NAAs helping to cross-fertilise best-practices across operators.<br />
AMC to AR.OPS.300 Certification procedure OPS<br />
PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL OF CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS<br />
The competent authority should verify that:<br />
1. the applicant is in compliance with the applicable requirements and recognized standards;<br />
2. the procedures specified in the procedures manual are sufficient for the safe transport of<br />
dangerous goods;<br />
3. operations personnel is properly trained; and<br />
4. a reporting scheme is in place.<br />
This is shown as an example, if de-icing / anti-icing was ever considered as requiring special<br />
airsight GmbH - 54 -