Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
OPS 1.625<br />
Mass and balance documentation<br />
(See Appendix 1 to OPS 1.625)<br />
(a) An operator shall establish mass and balance documentation prior to each flight<br />
specifying the load and its distribution. The mass and balance documentation must enable<br />
the commander to determine that the load and its distribution is such that the mass and<br />
balance limits of the aeroplane are not exceeded. The person preparing the mass and<br />
balance documentation must be named on the document. The person supervising the<br />
loading of the aeroplane must confirm by signature that the load and its distribution are in<br />
accordance with the mass and balance documentation. This document must be acceptable<br />
to the commander, his/her acceptance being indicated by countersignature or equivalent.<br />
(See also OPS 1.1055 (a)12).<br />
(b) An operator must specify procedures for last minute changes to the load.<br />
(c) Subject to the approval of the Authority, an operator may use an alternative to the<br />
procedures required by paragraphs (a) and (b) above.<br />
This Rule is included because of the similarities with de-icing / anti-icing in respect of the<br />
effect on airworthiness if the task of loading is incorrectly carried out, and the fact that<br />
loading and the creation of the documentation is often conducted by sub-contracted service<br />
providers.<br />
It is conceivable that a similar regulation for de-icing / anti-icing could be proposed. That is,<br />
any documentation and/or communication passed from the de-icing / anti-icing service<br />
provider to the operator and/or captain, must enable the captain to determine an accurate<br />
holdover time and that the aircraft is free of contamination.<br />
If operators want to use alternative procedures, then they would be required to seek<br />
Authority approval.<br />
Details of the anti-icing code can be placed in an Appendix.<br />
This would confirm that the anti-icing code has a specific purpose, and that service providers,<br />
flight crew and flight operations were all interpreting the code in the same way: thus<br />
eliminating confusion as to the meaning of the code. Operators would have to amend<br />
contracts in order to ensure that service providers were aware of their post de-icing / antiicing<br />
inspection and communication responsibilities.<br />
airsight GmbH - 16 -