Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE <strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21 3.3 Summary of results of CRD for A-NPA 2007-11 Responses to Options for Operations: Stakeholders tended to be dissatisfied with the chosen option to do nothing. The Agency invited them to comment on the transposition of EU OPS 1.345, 1.346 and associated AMCs into the forthcoming Implementing Rules Operations (NPA 2009-02). NB: the Comment-Response Document to this NPA is currently under review (as of Oct 2010). Responses to Options for Service Providers: A majority of the commentators preferred option 3 (regulatory approval of the service providers) to the Agency’s proposed option 2 (encouragement of industry standards and monitoring programs) as a way forward with respect to service providers that perform de-icing / anti-icing services. Option 2 was considered as the status quo and that only the certification of service providers would make a significant difference. Responses to Options for Aerodromes: Because of the heterogeneous models for provision of de-icing / anti-icing across different states, weather zones and business models, there was no clear consensus concerning the Agency’s preferred option of rulemaking to ensure a range of fluids is available. However, the economic cost resulting from imposing a range of fluid types to be available at aerodromes were highlighted. NB: no aerodrome responded to the A-NPA. Conclusion Most commentators to A-NPA 2007-11 would wish that: a. An appropriate range of fluids is maintained and offered at each aerodrome receiving commercial air transport aircraft; b. De-icing / Anti-icing service providers be approved, and; c. Fluids are certified. However, whilst the Agency concurs with these comments, both fluids and aerodromes (at the time) were outside of the Agency’s remit, and therefore these would remain long-term goals. The Agency did however initiate actions to address the inspection for, and cleaning of, deicing / anti-icing fluid residues; and, the remaining areas were included in a six-point plan for the medium to long-term. One of these areas formed the basis for this Study, whilst one other area will also be partially addressed by convenience during this Study; these are: − Investigate and recommend the means by which Aviation Authorities of Member States manage matters in regard to the certification of service providers, availability of fluids at aerodromes, etc (midterm), and airsight GmbH 9
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE <strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21 − Make, as far as possible, provisions in the implementing rules on the safety of aerodromes with a view to make the operations of de-icing / anti-icing service providers safer and ensure the availability of fluids (midterm). These two tasks, above, support the remaining unaddressed recommendations made by the AAIB and BFU as mentioned above (1b, 1c & 3a), which will be considered by this Study: − To make Type I fluids available at airports regularly used by aircraft with non-powered flying controls. − To ensure Type I fluids are applied at airports regularly used by aircraft with nonpowered flying controls. − Consideration should be given to establishing regulations such that de-icing / anti-icing training and operations are accomplished by certified and approved companies under the supervision of authorities. airsight GmbH 10
Page 1 and 2:
Research Project EASA.2009/4 Regula
Page 3 and 4:
EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
Page 5 and 6:
INTERIM REPORT - INTRODUCTION EASA.
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
INTERIM REPORT - DATA SUMMARY AND A
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30: INTERIM REPORT - DATA SUMMARY AND A
Page 69 and 70: EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
Page 71 and 72: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 79: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 131 and 132:
INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
show all

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?