Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B <strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21 Location 1) storage tanks and transfer systems for de-icing/anti-icing fluids; and 2) de-icing crew shelter. 3.15.2 Recommendation.— De-icing/anti-icing facilities should be provided either at aircraft stands or at specified remote areas along the taxiway leading to the runway meant for takeoff, provided that adequate drainage arrangements for the collection and safe disposal of excess de-icing/anti-icing fluids are available to prevent ground water contamination. The effect of volume of traffic and departure flow rates should also be considered. Note 1.— One of the primary factors influencing the location of a de-icing/anti-icing facility is to ensure that the holdover time of the anti-icing treatment is still in effect at the end of taxiing and when take-off clearance of the treated aeroplane is given. Note 2.— Remote facilities compensate for changing weather conditions when icing conditions or blowing snow are expected to occur along the taxi-route taken by the aeroplane to the runway meant for take-off. Doc 9640 Off-terminal de-icing/anti-icing 8.11 De-icing/anti-icing facilities away from the terminal are recommended when terminal de-icing/anti-icing facilities (including apron facilities) cause excessive gate delays and/or taxi times that frequently cause holdover times to be exceeded. Remote pad de-icing/anti-icing facilities 8.12 Remote de-icing/anti-icing facilities located near departure runway ends or along taxiways are recommended when taxi times from terminals or off-terminal deicing/anti-icing locations frequently exceed holdover times. The proper design of these facilities can also improve flow control by permitting repeat de-icing/anti-icing of aeroplane critical surfaces without the aeroplane having to return to more distant treatment sites. 3.15.4 Recommendation.— The remote de-icing/anti-icing facility should be so located as to provide for an expeditious traffic flow, perhaps with a bypass configuration, and not require unusual taxiing manoeuvre into and out of the pads. Note.— The jet blast effects caused by a moving aeroplane on other aeroplanes receiving the anti-icing treatment or taxiing behind will have to be taken into account to prevent degradation of the treatment. 3.15.6 Recommendation.— The number of de-icing/anti-icing pads required should be airsight GmbH - 66 -
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B <strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21 determined based on the meteorological conditions, the type of aeroplanes to be treated, the method of application of de-icing/anti-icing fluid, the type and capacity of the dispensing equipment used, and the departure flow rates. Note.— See the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 2. Environmental considerations Note.— The excess de-icing/anti-icing fluid running off an aeroplane poses the risk of contamination of ground water in addition to affecting the pavement surface friction characteristics. 3.15.11 Recommendation.— Where de-icing/anti-icing activities are carried out, the surface drainage should be planned to collect the run-off separately, preventing its mixing with the normal surface run-off so that it does not pollute the ground water. Doc 9640 De-icing/anti-icing facilities must be designed in accordance with local environmental rules and regulations. Environmental factors that have to be considered are: a) protecting the environment against toxic substances; b) isolating and collecting used glycol and any other de-icing/anti-icing contaminants to prevent run-off into the aerodrome storm drainage system; and c) recycling the used glycol. All of these criteria are “recommended” and not “required”, therefore there is no encouragement for the development of new facilities which may enhance safety and improve coordination. Instead decisions to “upgrade” will likely be taken mainly on commercial grounds. The list of what are items are included as facilities from Doc 9640 includes the de-icing / antiicing vehicles, fluid storage etc. This is interesting if the aerodrome should be providing. Even if the aerodrome allows third-parties to provide some of the facilities, it remains responsible through Annex 14. The environmental considerations (backed-up by local government regulations) to recommend drainage will restrict some aerodromes to only conduct de-icing / anti-icing on the Ramp, even though it may not be the most convenient or safe option. Moving operations to a remote area may involve great expense. The emphasis in Doc 9640 is different than in the Annex: ie facilities are required compared to the Annex should be provided. Doc 9640 contains an interesting recommendation that aerodromes should for two-step deicing / anti-icing for all operations, regardless of whether it is taken-up or not. airsight GmbH - 67 -
Page 1 and 2:
Research Project EASA.2009/4 Regula
Page 3 and 4:
EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
Page 5 and 6:
INTERIM REPORT - INTRODUCTION EASA.
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
INTERIM REPORT - DATA SUMMARY AND A
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 227: INTERIM REPORT - OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
Page 255 and 256: EASA.2009.OP 21 Study on the regula
show all

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?