17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

Proposed Implementing Rules as contained within <strong>EASA</strong> NPAs 2008-22 and 2009-02<br />

improve the situation slightly, however, there is great scope for improving these further:<br />

− AR.GEN.030(a) Mutual Exchange of Information – requires Authorities to share all<br />

necessary information taken as a result of oversight of persons and organizations<br />

exercising activities on the territory of a Member State. However, service providers<br />

are not included as they are not directly within the oversight of the Authorities unless<br />

such data is obtained as a result of the oversight of operators.<br />

− AR.GEN.040(a) <strong>Report</strong>ing – requires NAAs to notify the Agency of any safety<br />

significant occurrences in addition to those required in Directive 2003/42/EC. No<br />

explanation is given as to what is meant by “significant”, leaving the way clear for<br />

different interpretation.<br />

− AMC 2 AR.GEN.300.2 Continuing oversight OPS – how an operator oversees all<br />

ground-handling services is omitted from the list of areas the Authority should at least<br />

inspect and monitor.<br />

− AMC 2 to OR.GEN.200(a)(2) Management System – fulfils the requirements of ICAO<br />

SMS SARPs, with some additional parameters. However, it still does not categorically<br />

focus the operator onto the collection of reports of “unsafe acts” from contractor<br />

organisations. However, without this data, an operator will not be able to fulfil other<br />

elements of the Rule; i.e. to identify all the hazards associated with de-icing / antiicing,<br />

assess the associated risk and make interventions to improve safety<br />

performance in this area. The outcome of this Rule depends on the interpretation.<br />

− AMC 2 to OR.GEN.200(a)(4) Management System, Training and Communication on<br />

Safety – this requires the organisation to establish communication so that safety<br />

matters can be explained. This is limited to within the operators own organisation.<br />

− AMC to OR.GEN.200(a)(5) Management System, Occurrence <strong>Report</strong>ing – in<br />

contradiction to the title, this mirrors EU OPS 1.037 and only highlights the need to<br />

report Incidents and Accidents, therefore excluding “unsafe acts” and other valuable<br />

safety data.<br />

− AMC to OR.GEN.205 Contracting and purchasing – this re-introduces JAA AMC OPS<br />

1.035 material on quality assurance of contracting organisations. It also clearly<br />

requires operators to specify in their contracts with service providers what safety<br />

services and safety related activities should be undertaken; thus providing a<br />

mechanism to include the collection, analysis and provision of specific safety data.<br />

airsight GmbH 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!