Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Interim Report - Introduction - EASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE<br />
<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />
Proposed Implementing Rules as contained within <strong>EASA</strong> NPAs 2008-22 and 2009-02<br />
improve the situation slightly, however, there is great scope for improving these further:<br />
− AR.GEN.030(a) Mutual Exchange of Information – requires Authorities to share all<br />
necessary information taken as a result of oversight of persons and organizations<br />
exercising activities on the territory of a Member State. However, service providers<br />
are not included as they are not directly within the oversight of the Authorities unless<br />
such data is obtained as a result of the oversight of operators.<br />
− AR.GEN.040(a) <strong>Report</strong>ing – requires NAAs to notify the Agency of any safety<br />
significant occurrences in addition to those required in Directive 2003/42/EC. No<br />
explanation is given as to what is meant by “significant”, leaving the way clear for<br />
different interpretation.<br />
− AMC 2 AR.GEN.300.2 Continuing oversight OPS – how an operator oversees all<br />
ground-handling services is omitted from the list of areas the Authority should at least<br />
inspect and monitor.<br />
− AMC 2 to OR.GEN.200(a)(2) Management System – fulfils the requirements of ICAO<br />
SMS SARPs, with some additional parameters. However, it still does not categorically<br />
focus the operator onto the collection of reports of “unsafe acts” from contractor<br />
organisations. However, without this data, an operator will not be able to fulfil other<br />
elements of the Rule; i.e. to identify all the hazards associated with de-icing / antiicing,<br />
assess the associated risk and make interventions to improve safety<br />
performance in this area. The outcome of this Rule depends on the interpretation.<br />
− AMC 2 to OR.GEN.200(a)(4) Management System, Training and Communication on<br />
Safety – this requires the organisation to establish communication so that safety<br />
matters can be explained. This is limited to within the operators own organisation.<br />
− AMC to OR.GEN.200(a)(5) Management System, Occurrence <strong>Report</strong>ing – in<br />
contradiction to the title, this mirrors EU OPS 1.037 and only highlights the need to<br />
report Incidents and Accidents, therefore excluding “unsafe acts” and other valuable<br />
safety data.<br />
− AMC to OR.GEN.205 Contracting and purchasing – this re-introduces JAA AMC OPS<br />
1.035 material on quality assurance of contracting organisations. It also clearly<br />
requires operators to specify in their contracts with service providers what safety<br />
services and safety related activities should be undertaken; thus providing a<br />
mechanism to include the collection, analysis and provision of specific safety data.<br />
airsight GmbH 23