17.11.2012 Views

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

Interim Report - Introduction - EASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERIM REPORT – OPTIONS FOR CHANGE – ATTACHMENT B<br />

<strong>EASA</strong>.2009.OP.21<br />

necessarily the technical complexities of sub-contracted services.<br />

Requiring operators to nominate one single person as their de-icing / anti-icing<br />

“coordinator/expert/post-holder” may improve communication between all departments, and<br />

also with the NAA. The results of our Study show that de-icing / anti-icing experience and<br />

knowledge within operators’ organisations are fragmented, and therefore one assumes the<br />

decision-making process on matters concerning de-icing / anti-icing is not efficient. Providing<br />

more detailed supporting information detailing the roles and responsibilities of nominated<br />

post-holders may also have the same effect.<br />

The act of nominating a focal-point, any necessary in-house training, and any subsequent<br />

establishment of new procedures can all be achieved within the existing management<br />

organisation; however, the benefits derived from improved coordination, communication and<br />

awareness could be substantial.<br />

OPS 1.175 (m)<br />

General rules for air operator certification<br />

The operator must arrange appropriate ground handling facilities to ensure the safe handling<br />

of its flights.<br />

This is more like an Essential Requirement, high level regulation, than an Implementing Rule.<br />

There is no expansion or explanation, however, accepting de-icing / anti-icing as a groundhandling<br />

operation, this Regulation would apply. In practice the de-icing / anti-icing facilities<br />

are often owned and managed by the aerodrome management, which is often separate from<br />

the de-icing / anti-icing service provision. Therefore, this requirement will need to be met by<br />

the operator through the quality system oversight of both aerodromes and service providers.<br />

The Regulation could be amended to state that the operator must ensure through the quality<br />

system etc, this is merely cosmetic, but it would be appropriate. Otherwise, far more detailed<br />

information could be given to explain to operators exactly what is required, both in the Rule<br />

and as supporting information.<br />

No great positive or negative impact to be made from these options.<br />

OPS 1.205<br />

Competence of operations personnel<br />

airsight GmbH - 11 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!