30.11.2012 Views

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

came to the conclusion that innovative changes are the work of an individual<br />

and not of a community. This led him to distinguish between:<br />

– invention – a scientific fact providing innovative opportunities;<br />

– innovation – the application of invention resulting in new technological<br />

solutions;<br />

– imitation – any simplification of innovation.<br />

Imitation as defined by Schumpeter should be understood today as the processes<br />

of innovation diffusion, which may be labelled copying or imitating.<br />

These innovation processes are often of greater significance than the innovations<br />

themselves. It should be underlined that these innovation processes are interlinked<br />

with the technology transfer processes. However, according to Schumpeter,<br />

innovation processes were not the activities connected with imitation.<br />

Furthermore, Schumpeter believed that considering innovation diffusion processes<br />

and social benefits resulting from innovation, only big corporations and<br />

imperfect competition may create innovation processes. This understanding of<br />

innovation processes has had to be revised as the highly competitive market<br />

with participation of small companies can create innovations e.g., in the area of<br />

high-tech 6 .<br />

According to Schumpeter, economic development is determined by the fact<br />

that innovation is erratic, complementary and forms a long chain of transformation<br />

sequences; as innovation diffuses, the economy enters the state of imbalance;<br />

innovations tend to concentrate in a specific time and place. According to<br />

Schumpeter’s theory, economic development is dependent on three factors: innovation,<br />

entrepreneur and bank credit 7 .<br />

In macroeconomic terms, Schumpeter analysed mutual relations between<br />

innovations and investment levels. On the basis of conducted studies, he came<br />

to the conclusion that implementing innovations connected with greater capital<br />

spending changes the allocation of production factors. According to the classical<br />

definition of innovation presented by Schumpeter, we can assume that in terms<br />

of the economy of a given country innovations mean a better allocation of resources<br />

and a positive impact on economic growth and the ability to compete in<br />

international markets. A similar opinion is expressed by P. F. Drucker who sees<br />

innovation as a characteristic tool of entrepreneurship, a measure that gives resources<br />

the drive for generating wealth. He is of the opinion that innovations<br />

have more to do with the social and economic spheres than with the technical,<br />

while at the level of an enterprise technical innovations are decisive. His studies<br />

emphasise that the greatest economic resource is the purchasing power, which<br />

is generated by entrepreneurs introducing innovations 8 .<br />

6 E. Stawasz, Innowacje a ma³a firma, Wydawnictwo U£, £ódŸ 1999, p. 12.<br />

7 J. A. Schumpeter, Teoria rozwoju.., op. cit.; S. Mikosik, Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego Josepha<br />

A. Schumpetera, PWN, Warsaw 1993, pp. 74-83.<br />

8 P. F. Drucker, Innowacja i przedsiêbiorczoœæ. Praktyka i zasady, PWE, Warsaw 1992, p. 39.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!