30.11.2012 Views

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

Untitled - Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2.3 Firm renewal (SM Es entries + exits) 5.1 United Kingdom (10.3) --<br />

2.2.4 Public-private co-publications<br />

Throughputs<br />

31.4 Sweden (116.1) 1.3<br />

2.3.1 EPO patents 105.7 Germany (275) 3.0<br />

2.3.2 Community trademarks 124.6 Luxembourg (1220) 33.2<br />

2.3.3 Community designs 121.8 Luxembourg (1018.6) 45.5<br />

2.3.4 Technology Balance of Payments flows<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

Innovators<br />

1.07 Ireland (9.92) 0.40<br />

3.1.1 SM Es introducing product or process<br />

innovations<br />

33.7 Germany (52.8) 20.4<br />

3.1.2 SM Es introducing marketing<br />

or organisational innovations<br />

40.0 Germany (68.1) 29.1<br />

3.1.3 Resource efficiency innovators -- -- --<br />

3.1.3a Reduced labour costs 18.0 Cyprus (29.2) 13.8<br />

3.1.3b Reduced use of materials and energy<br />

Economic effects<br />

9.6 Greece (20.7) 11.6<br />

3.2.1 Employment in medium-high & hightech<br />

manufacturing<br />

6.69 Czech Rep. (10.85) 5.50<br />

3.2.2 Employment in knowledge-intensive<br />

services<br />

14.51 Luxembourg (23.94) 10.33<br />

3.2.3 Medium-tech and high-tech<br />

manufacturing exports<br />

48.1 Malta (74.5) 48.9<br />

3.2.4 Knowledge-intensive services exports 48.7 Luxembourg (82.4) 27.9<br />

3.2.5 New-to-market sales 8.60 Malta (24.79) 4.56<br />

3.2.6 New-to-firm sales 6.28 Romania (13.69) 5.55<br />

Source: own study based on European Innovation Scoreboard 2008. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance.<br />

Innometrics, January 2009.<br />

Unfortunately, though some indicators show a rising trend, Poland rates<br />

fifth last in terms of the Summary Innovation Index (Fig. 7), before Romania,<br />

Bulgaria and Greece. In the group of countries covered by the European Innovation<br />

Scoreboard, Sweden is the leader, rating first. Leading positions among<br />

EU states are also held by Switzerland, Finland, Denmark and Germany. SII indicates<br />

the gap between EU states (average SII for EU-25) and the United States<br />

and Japan.<br />

The weak position of Poland results from low EIS indicators, which show an<br />

increase over the previous year but continue to lag behind EU average. Research<br />

funding continues to be a problem for Poland. R&D expenditure in 2008<br />

amounted to a mere 0.56% GDP, whereas the European average stands at 1.82%.<br />

We should also remember that the Lisbon Strategy assumed that by 2010 expenditure<br />

for R&D were to reach 3% GDP in all member states. Taking into account<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!