08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156<br />

Part Two<br />

Design<br />

The blue dotted line in Figure 6.8 shows this effect. The two other blue lines show similar<br />

curves for a 600-unit plant and a 1,000-unit plant. Figure 6.8 also shows that a similar relationship<br />

occurs between the average-cost curves for plants of increasing size. As the nominal<br />

capacity of the plants increases, the lowest-cost points at first reduce. There are two main reasons<br />

for this:<br />

Economies of scale<br />

Diseconomies of scale<br />

●<br />

●<br />

The fixed costs of an operation do not increase proportionately as its capacity increases.<br />

An 800-unit plant has less than twice the fixed costs of a 400-unit plant.<br />

The capital costs of building the plant do not increase proportionately to its capacity. An<br />

800-unit plant costs less to build than twice the cost of a 400-unit plant.<br />

These two factors, taken together, are often referred to as economies of scale. However,<br />

above a certain size, the lowest-cost point may increase. In Figure 6.8 this happens with plants<br />

above 800 units capacity. This occurs because of what are called the diseconomies of scale,<br />

two of which are particularly important. First, transportation costs can be high for large<br />

operations. For example, if a manufacturer supplies its global market from one major plant<br />

in Denmark, materials may have to be brought in to, and shipped from, several countries.<br />

Second, complexity costs increase as size increases. The communications and coordination<br />

effort necessary to manage an operation tends to increase faster than capacity. Although not<br />

seen as a direct cost, it can nevertheless be very significant.<br />

Scale of capacity and the demand–capacity balance<br />

Large units of capacity also have some disadvantages when the capacity of the operation is<br />

being changed to match changing demand. For example, suppose that the air-conditioning unit<br />

manufacturer forecasts demand increase over the next three years, as shown in Figure 6.9,<br />

to level off at around 2,400 units a week. If the company seeks to satisfy all demand by building<br />

three plants, each of 800 units capacity, the company will have substantial amounts of<br />

over-capacity for much of the period when demand is increasing. Over-capacity means low<br />

capacity utilization, which in turn means higher unit costs. If the company builds smaller<br />

plants, say 400-unit plants, there will still be over-capacity but to a lesser extent, which means<br />

higher capacity utilization and possibly lower costs.<br />

Figure 6.9 The scale of capacity increments affects the utilization of capacity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!