08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

586<br />

Part Four<br />

Improvement<br />

Preventing failure occurring<br />

Once a thorough understanding of the causes and effects of failure has been established, the<br />

next responsibility of operations managers is to try to prevent the failures occurring in the<br />

first place. The obvious way to do this is to systematically examine any processes involved<br />

and ‘design out’ any failure points. Many of the approaches used in Chapters 4 and 5 on<br />

process and product/service design and Chapter 17 on quality management can be used to<br />

do this. In this section we will look at three further approaches to reducing risk by trying<br />

to prevent failure: building redundancy into a process, ‘fail-safeing’ some of the activities in<br />

the process, and maintaining the physical facilities in the process.<br />

Redundancy<br />

Redundancy<br />

Building in redundancy to an operation means having back-up systems or components in<br />

case of failure. It can be expensive and is generally used when the breakdown could have<br />

a critical impact. It means doubling or even tripling some parts of a process or system in case<br />

one component fails. Nuclear power stations, spacecraft and hospitals all have auxiliary<br />

systems in case of an emergency. Some organizations also have ‘back-up’ staff held in reserve<br />

in case someone does not turn up for work. Rear-brake lighting sets in buses and trucks<br />

contain two bulbs to reduce the likelihood of not showing a red light. Human bodies contain<br />

two of some organs – kidneys and eyes, for example – both of which are used in ‘normal<br />

operation’ but the body can cope with a failure in one of them. The reliability of a component<br />

together with its back-up is given by the sum of the reliability of the original component and<br />

the likelihood that the back-up component will both be needed and be working.<br />

where<br />

R a+b = R a + (R b × P (failure))<br />

R a+b = reliability of component a with its back-up component b<br />

R a = reliability of a alone<br />

R b = reliability of back-up component b<br />

P (failure) = the probability that component a will fail and therefore component b<br />

will be needed.<br />

Worked example<br />

The food manufacturer in the earlier worked example has decided that the cheese depositor<br />

in the pizza-making machine is so unreliable that it needs a second cheese depositor<br />

to be fitted to the machine which will come into action if the first cheese depositor fails.<br />

The two cheese depositors (each with reliability = 0.9) working together will have a<br />

reliability of:<br />

0.9 + [0.9 × (1 − 0.9)] = 0.99<br />

The reliability of the whole machine is now:<br />

0.95 × 0.99 × 0.97 × 0.99 × 0.98 = 0.885<br />

Redundancy is often used for servers, where system availability is particularly important.<br />

In this context, the industry used three main types of redundancy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!