08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 20 Organizing for improvement 625<br />

➤ What information is needed for improvement?<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

It is unlikely that for any operation a single measure of performance will adequately reflect the<br />

whole of a performance objective. Usually operations have to collect a whole bundle of partial<br />

measures of performance.<br />

Each partial measure then has to be compared against some performance standard. There are<br />

four types of performance standard commonly used:<br />

– historical standards, which compare performance now against performance sometime in<br />

the past;<br />

– target performance standards, which compare current performance against some desired<br />

level of performance;<br />

– competitor performance standards, which compare current performance against competitors’<br />

performance;<br />

– absolute performance standards, which compare current performance against its theoretically<br />

perfect state.<br />

The process of benchmarking is often used as a means of obtaining competitor performance<br />

standards.<br />

➤ What should be improvement priorities?<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Improvement priorities can be determined by bringing together the relative importance of each<br />

performance objective or competitive factor as judged by customers, with the performance<br />

which the operation achieves as compared with its competition. This idea can be consolidated<br />

on an ‘importance–performance matrix’.<br />

The ‘sandcone model’ provides an alternative approach to prioritization. It recommends that<br />

improvement should cumulatively emphasize quality, dependability, speed, flexibility, and then<br />

cost.<br />

➤ How can organizational culture affect improvement?<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

An organization’s ability to improve its operations performance depends to a large extent on<br />

its ‘culture’, that is ‘the pattern of shared basic assumptions . . . that have worked well enough<br />

to be considered valid’. A receptive organizational culture that encourages a constant search<br />

for improved ways to do things can encourage improvement.<br />

According to Bessant and Caffyn there are specific abilities, behaviours and actions which<br />

need to be consciously developed if improvement is to sustain over the long term.<br />

Many of the abilities and behaviours related to an improvement culture relate to learning in<br />

some way. The learning process is important because it encourages, facilitates and exploits<br />

the learning that occurs during improvement. This involves two types of learning, single- and<br />

double-loop learning.<br />

– Single-loop learning occurs when there is repetitive and predictable link between cause and<br />

effect.<br />

– Double-loop learning questions the fundamental objectives, service or even the underlying<br />

culture of the operation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!