08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

260<br />

Part Two<br />

Design<br />

them. This means it is unlikely that it will be worth studying activities which, for example,<br />

may soon be discontinued or are only performed occasionally. On the other hand, the types<br />

of job which should be studied as a matter of priority are those which, for example, seem<br />

to offer the greatest scope for improvement, or which are causing bottlenecks, delays or<br />

problems in the operation.<br />

Step 2 – Recording the present method<br />

There are many different recording techniques used in method study. Most of them:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

record the sequence of activities in the job;<br />

record the time interrelationship of the activities in the job; or<br />

record the path of movement of some part of the job.<br />

Perhaps the most commonly used recording technique in method study is process mapping,<br />

which was discussed in Chapter 4. Note that we are here recording the present method of<br />

doing the job. It may seem strange to devote so much time and effort to recording what<br />

is currently happening when, after all, the objective of method study is to devise a better<br />

method. The rationale for this is, first of all, that recording the present method can give a<br />

far greater insight into the job itself, and this can lead to new ways of doing it. Second,<br />

recording the present method is a good starting point from which to evaluate it critically<br />

and therefore improve it. In this last point the assumption is that it is easier to improve the<br />

method by starting from the current method and then criticizing it in detail than by starting<br />

with a ‘blank sheet of paper’.<br />

Step 3 – Examining the facts<br />

This is probably the most important stage in method study and the idea here is to examine<br />

the current method thoroughly and critically. This is often done by using the so-called<br />

‘questioning technique’. This technique attempts to detect weaknesses in the rationale for<br />

existing methods so that alternative methods can be developed (see Table S9.1). The approach<br />

Table S9.1 The method study questioning technique<br />

Broad question<br />

The purpose of each activity (questions the fundamental need<br />

for the element)<br />

The place in which each element is done (may suggest a<br />

combination of certain activities or operations)<br />

The sequence in which the elements are done (may suggest<br />

a change in the sequence of the activity)<br />

The person who does the activity (may suggest a combination<br />

and/or change in responsibility or sequence)<br />

The means by which each activity is done (may suggest<br />

new methods)<br />

Detailed question<br />

What is done?<br />

Why is it done?<br />

What else could be done?<br />

What should be done?<br />

Where is it done?<br />

Why is it done there?<br />

Where else could it be done?<br />

Where should it be done?<br />

When is it done?<br />

Why is it done then?<br />

When should it be done?<br />

Who does it?<br />

Why does that person do it?<br />

Who else could do it?<br />

Who should do it?<br />

How is it done?<br />

Why is it done in that way?<br />

How else could it be done?<br />

How should it be done?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!